Educação ambiental em escolas: sensibilizando o professor de pequenos municípios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613082778Keywords:
Environment, Citizenship, SchoolAbstract
Environmental education should be seen as extremely important in the training of students and beone with a unique corner in the Constitution in force, taking into consideration social, economic,political, cultural and ethical, as well as ecological, preparing and developing the student to betterquality of life and full exercise of citizenship. This monograph aims to do a survey about theconcept, purpose and functions of environmental education in the light of a practice that canfoster the development of citizenship among the students, as well as present the results of aninterview, qualitative, conducted among teachers City Cacequi, RS, in order to identify theirexperiences in environmental education, as well as bring out the concerns that preclude a fullypractice it efficiently. Notes on the ending of this research that issues such as lack of training,discussion, reading, political and pedagogical rules are some of the many factors that preventenvironmental education also serves as a foundation and practice of citizenship.Downloads
References
AMBIENTAL Educação - Competências para o atuar docente-SILVA, Clotildes Lessa, da ARAÚJO, Daniel, organização. Senac-EAD-RS, 2008.
ANDRADE, D. F. Implementação da Educação Ambiental em escolas: uma reflexão. In: Fundação Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental, v. 4.out/nov/dez 2000.
ARROYO Miguel Gonzáles. Pátria Amada, Ignorada. In: Em Aberto. Brasília, 7(37), jan.-mar. 1988.
BRANDÃO, Carlos Rodrigues. O que é educação. São Paulo, Brasiliense, 1994.
CASCINO, F. 1999. Educação Ambiental: Princípios, História, Formação de Professores. Editora SENAC, SP.
CAMARGO, Dulce Maria Pompêo; ZAMBONI, Ernesta. A Criança Novos Tempos, Novos Espaços; a História e a Geografia na Escola. In: Em Aberto. Brasília, 7 (37), jan-mar. 1988.
DIAS, G. F. 2000. Educação Ambiental: Princípios e Práticas. Editora Gaia, 6a. Edição, SP.
DUARTE JUNIOS, J. F. O que é Realidade? São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1984.
EDUCAÇÃO ambiental: curso básico à distância: Educação e educação ambiental II. Coordenação-Geral: Ana Lúcia Tostes de Aquino Leite e Naná Mininni-Medina. Brasília: MMA, 2001. 5 v. 2a edição ampliada.
FREIRE, Paulo. Educação e Mudança. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1981.
GONZÁLEZ, Gaudiano, E. Educación ambiental: história y conceptos a veinte años de Tbilisi. México, DF: Sistemas Técnicos de Edición, 1997.
IBAMA. Educação Ambiental: as grandes orientações da Conferência de Tbilisi. Organizado pela UNESCO. Coleção meio ambiente. Série estudos educação ambiental; edição especial. Brasília: Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis, 1998.
JACOBI, Pedro. , OLIVEIRA, F. José. Educação, Meio Ambiente e Cidadania. São Paulo, SMA/CEAM, 1998.
JORNAL MUNDO JOVEM. Junho/1999 n. º 297 p 78.
LEFF, E. Epistemologia ambiental. Tradução: S. Valenzuela. São Paulo: Cortez, 2001a.
LIPIETZ, A. A ecologia política: solução para a crise da instância política? In: ALIMONDA, H. (Ed.). Ecologia política. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2002.
OLIVEIRA, E.M. O Que fazer Interdisciplinar. In: A Educação Ambiental uma possível abordagem. Brasília, Edições IBAMA, 2000.
PÁDUA, S.; TABANEZ, M. (orgs.). Educação ambiental: caminhos trilhados no Brasil. São Paulo: Ipê, 1998.
PIAGET, Jean. Para onde vai à educação. Editora José Olimpio 9ª Edição: 1998.
REIGOTA, Marcos. O que é educação ambiental. São Paulo, Brasiliense, 2006.
REVISTA, Nova Escola para professores de primeiro grau, Fundação Vitor Sivita. Editora Abril. São Paulo, ano VII, 59 - agosto 1992. p 14.
TEIXEIRA, Anísio. Educação é um direito. Editora Nacional 1968.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
