THE REMOTE SENSING AS A TEACHING TOOL AT THE INSTITUTE FEDERAL FARROUPILHA CAMPUS JAGUARI - RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X16090Keywords:
Ensino Técnico, Sensoriamento Remoto, EducaçãoAbstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2179460X16090
This study addresses the integration and use of technology in professional and technological education level, with emphasis on remote sensing tools. The overall objective of the research was to conduct a diagnosis of the use of Remote Sensing technology, technical education, with technical courses in Agriculture, Information Technology, Sales, Agribusiness and Administration courses offered by these Instituto Federal Farroupilha Campus Jaguari RS. Methodologically the study started with literature search to identify work already developed on Remote Sensing in Vocational and Technical Education; after the field research and the audience were chosen, we applied a questionnaire consisting of two parts, the first part in order to identify and the second theoretical part, with questions specific knowledge about Remote Sensing. The next step was to organize the data collected, confection tables and graphs; from these data, we proceeded to an argumentative analysis, some of the results showed that most students is the Technical Course in Management, female and living in the city of Jaguari-RS. Approximately half of the sample says he never heard of SR, but claim to have interest in this matter and believe that the SR can be connected in some way with its technical course, thus highlighting the importance of working together with students and teachers, aimed at addressing the concepts and theories of SR as the reality of each course.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
