Rural agroecosystems under the sustainability aspect: an analysis in the southern Amazonas state
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X70866Keywords:
Agroecosystem, Sustainable development, Family farming, Statistical tools, AmazonAbstract
Sustainable development seeks to improve people’s lives and associates economic development and environmental preservation with proper management of natural resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sustainability of agroecosystems, based on some sustainability indicators, covering the economic, social and environmental dimensions of rural and rural riverside properties in the southern Amazon region, a predominantly family farming region. The research was based on the SIA - Sustainability Indicators in Agroecosystems, carried out in an interdisciplinary and participative way, and for this purpose, it was necessary to contextualize the bases of the theoretical currents of sustainable development, establishing the historical and current insertion of family agriculture, addressing the attributes of sustainability in the socioeconomic and environmental dimensions. The methodological proposal applied was multivariate statistical analysis, Principal Component Analysis, from the three production systems, in order to identify the similarities underlying all the multiple relationships existing between the indicators, for the construction of the Sustainability Index (SI). Through the use of graphs and tables it was possible to evaluate the production systems in an integrated way and it was verified that the systems are different even though they are inserted in the same region and present a regular sustainability index.
Downloads
References
Altieri, M. & Toledo, V. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 3, 587-612. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.582947
Andrade, E. M., Carneiro Neto, J. A., Freitas Rosa, M., Palácio, H. A. Q. & Rodrigues, J. O. (2009). Classificação da sustentabilidade das unidades de produção agrícola no perímetro irrigado Araras Norte, Ceará. Scientia Agraria, 10(2), 157-164. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rsa.v10i2.13592
Andrade, E. M.; Meireles, A. C. M.; Palácio, H. A. Q. (2010). Técnicas de estatística multivariada aplicadas a estudos de qualidade de água e solo. Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Salinidade. In: Manejo da salinidade na agricultura: Estudos básicos e aplicados. 2 ed. 115-126. ISBN 978-85-420-0948-4
Brasil. (1978). Projeto Radambrasil – folha SB. 20 Purus. Ministério das Minas e Energia. Rio de Janeiro, 561p.
Brasil. (2009). Desenvolvimento Sustentável: Responsabilidade e Compromisso de Todos. Disponível em: http://www.cop15.gov.br/pt-BR/index225c.html?page=noticias/acordo-de- copenhague. Acesso em:19/09/2019.
Carneiro Neto, J. A.; Andrade, E. M.; Rosa, M.F.; Bastos, F. S.; Lopes, J. F. B. (2008). Índice de sustentabilidade agroambiental para perímetro irrigado Ayres de Souza. Ciência Agrotécnia, 32(4), 1272-1279.
EMBRAPA - Centro Nacional de pesquisas de solo. (1997). Avaliação da aptidão agrícola de áreas de cerrados em municípios do estado do Amazonas. Relatório Técnico, 91p.
Ferreira, J. M. L.; Viana, J. H. M.; Costa, A. D.; Sousa, D. D.; Fontes, A. A. Indicadores de Sustentabilidade em Agroecossistemas. Informe Agropecuário, 33 (271), 12-25, 2012.
Girão, E. G.; Andrande, E. M.; Rosa, M. D.; Araújo, L. D.; Meireles, A. C. (2007). Seleção de indicadores da qualidade de água no Rio Jaibaras pelo emprego da análise da componente principal. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 38 (1), 17-24.
Hair Juniror, J. F.; Anderson, R. E.; Tatham, R. L.; Black, W. C. (2005). Análise multivariada de dados. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 593p.
Hawkins, D. M. (1974). The detection of errors in multivariate data using principal components. Journal of the American Statistical Society, 69, 340-344, 1974.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2016). Censo Agropecuário 2016. Brasil Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 777p.
Luiz, A. J. B.; Silveira, M. A. (2000). Diagnóstico rápido e dialogado em estudos de desenvolvimento rural sustentável. Revista Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 35(1), 83- 91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000100011
Monteiro, V. P., Pinheiro, J. C. V. (2004). Critério para implantação de tecnologias de suprimentos de água potável em municípios cearenses afetados pelo alto teor de sal. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 42(2), 365-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20032004000200009
Norusis, M. J. (1990). SPSS base system users guide. Chicago: SPSS, 520p.
Palácio, H. A. Q. (2004). Índice de qualidade das águas na parte baixa da bacia hidrográfica do rio Trussu Ceará. 96 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Irrigação e Drenagem) – Curso de Pós-Graduação em Irrigação e Drenagem, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2004.
Reis, E. (2001). Estatística Multivariada Aplicada. Lisboa, Edições Sílabo, 343p.
Ribeiro, F. P. (2012). O paradigma ambiental na globalização neoliberal: da condição crítica ao protagonismo de mercado. Sociedade e Natureza, 24(2), 211-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-45132012000200004
Rodrigues, G. S.; Campanhola, C. (2003). Sistema integrado de avaliação de impacto ambiental aplicado às atividades do novo rural. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 38(4), 445-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2003000400001
Sands, G. R.; Podmore, T. H. (2000). A generalized environmental sustainability index for agricultural systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 79(1), 29–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00147-4
Seramim, R. J.; Lago, S. M. S. (2016). Estudo das publicações sobre sustentabilidade em pequenas propriedades rurais no período de 2005 a 2015. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura, 24(1), 113-141.
Silva, M. G. (2010). Questão Ambiental e o Desenvolvimento Sustentável: um desafio ético-político ao serviço social. São Paulo: Cortez, 120p.
Silveira, S. S.; Andrade, E. M. (2002). Análise de componente principal na investigação da estrutura multivariada da evapotranspiração. Engenharia Agrícola, 22(2), 171-177.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.