Recursos minerais do município de Santa Maria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27232Abstract
Brazil has its wide diversification of natural resources, due to geology of each area. It includes the mining as a process that gathers an economic progress and at the same time, it cannot, to cause unbalances and aggressions to the environment. The municipal district of Santa Maria in its mineral potential, seeking to the creation of immediate employment, linked mainly to the civil construction, developed essentially in extraction of clay, sands and the mineral water. The visual impact caused by the activity of mineral extraction change the municipal image, mainly due the ciliate forest extraction and the erosion. Than, the recovery of these areas becomes slower and complex. The mineral extraction in this district quest the economic and social development and supportability of resources in a pragmatic way relate with the industry of civil construction.Downloads
References
AKINAGA, R.M. Palestra de Abertura. In: Seminário Internacional sobre Mineração. Anais, São Paulo, 1989.p.14
BRASIL, Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral. Código de Mineração e Legislação Correlativa. Ed. ver. Por Humberto de Carvalho Matos - Brasília, Divisão de Fomento de Produção Mineral, 1982.
BRASIL, Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral. Curso de controle da Poluição na Mineração: alguns aspectos. 1986.
CMMAD - Comissão Mundial sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. "Nosso Futuro Comum". 2a ed., Rio de Janeiro, FGV, 1991. P. 49.
CHRISTOFOLETTI, A. Geomorfologia. São Paulo: Edgar Bucher, 1980.
FORNASARI Fº,N.; LEITE, C.A.G.; PRANDINI, F.L. & AZEVEDO, R.M.B. Avaliação Preliminar dos Problemas Causados pela Mineração no Meio Ambiente no Estado de São Paulo. S.n.t.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DO MEIO AMBIENTE E DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS RENOVÁVEIS - IBAMA. Manual de recuperação de áreas degradadas pela mineração. Técnicas de revegetação. Brasília, 1990.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE MINERAÇÃO - IBRAM. Mineração e meio ambiente. www.org.ibram.br/com Brasília, 2001.
RECUPERAÇÃO E MANEJO DE ÁREAS DEGRADADAS, 1997. Campinas. Memória do Workshop. Jaguariúna: EMBRAPA-CNPMA, 1998. 70. (EMBRAPA-CNPMA. Documentos 13).
SILVA, Gustavo Siqueira da Determinação e Mapeamento da Atividade Mineira em Santa Maria, sua Participação na Economia do Município, sua Relação com outras Atividades Econômicas e o Impacto Ambiental. Trabalho de Graduação. UFSM - Santa Maria
SCLlAR, C. Minerar é preciso?, Porto Alegre: PUCRS. Anais da 51ª Reunião Anual da SBPC, 1999
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
