Uso do solo e dinâmica de conflitos, na bacia do Rio dos Sinos - municípios de Campo Bom, Novo Hamburgo e São Leopoldo, RS, Brasil

Authors

  • Luis Eduardo Robaina Departamento de Geociências, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas - CCNE Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.
  • Adriano Severo Figueró Departamento de Geociências, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas - CCNE Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.
  • Sandro Sidnei Vargas de Cristo Departamento de Geociências, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas - CCNE Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27023

Abstract

The regional occupation has its origin dating back to the start of German immigration. The European settlers that arrived from the state of Rio Grande do Sul brought with them relatively more advance production techniques. Thus, there was rapid regional economic growth, based on agricultural products supplying Porto Alegre, the state's capital city. Capital accumulation in the region brought about industrialization which was also linked to the development of cattle raising activities due to abundance of laborpower and related raw materials. Urban occupation was divided in three categories, according to their intensity: high, medium and low as determined by building patterns, urban equipment and available services Non-urban areas are considered as being latent urban development grounds. Both the small farms used primarily for leisure activities and those with some agricultural and cattle raising activities seem to have little future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CAVALCANTI, A.P.B. Desenvolvimento sustentável e planejamento. Fortaleza: UFCE, 1997

IBGE. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Enciclopédia dos Municípios Brasileiros. IBGE, V. XXXIV, Rio Grande do Sul, P-Z. Rio de Janeiro, 1959, 411p.

LANDO, Aldair M. & BARROS, Eliane C. (1982). A colonização Alemã no Rio Grande do Sul, uma interpretação sociológica. Porto Alegre, 2ed., Movimento, 96p.

MACEDO, R.K. Gestão ambiental. Os instrumentos básicos para a gestão ambiental de territórios e unidades produtivas. Rio de Janeiro: ABES, 1994.

OLlVEN, Ruben G. (1984). Urbanização e Mudança Social no Brasil. Petrópolis, 3Ed., VOZES, 136p.

PORTO, Aurélio. (1934) Trabalho Alemão no Rio Grande do Sul. Estabelecimento Gráfico Santa Terezinha, Porto Alegre, 274p.

SANTOS, Milton (1996). A Urbanização Brasileira. 3Ed., São Paulo, HUCITEC, 157p.

TAUK-TORNISIELO, S.M. (org.) Análise ambiental: estratégias e ações. São Paulo: TA Queiroz, 1995.

Downloads

Published

1999-12-13

How to Cite

Robaina, L. E., Figueró, A. S., & Cristo, S. S. V. de. (1999). Uso do solo e dinâmica de conflitos, na bacia do Rio dos Sinos - municípios de Campo Bom, Novo Hamburgo e São Leopoldo, RS, Brasil. Ciência E Natura, 21(21), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27023

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 21, N. 21, 1999

Section

Articles

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.