Análise dos ambientes urbanos de risco do município de Santa Maria - RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27129Abstract
Santa Maria's city is located at the central region of Rio Grande of Sul. This work presents the referring information the areas of the city more aftected by risk events, it allowed the elaboration of a register of the risk situations. The studies of the dynamic of the system urban/environmental permited to fix the diagnostic causes of the geological/geomorphology processes. This register/diagnostic made possible identify the occurrence of processes of environmental risks, that are represented by mass moviments of stream of margins, landslide, and rockfall, besides the successive floods, associated, in general, with the areas of low income occupation.Downloads
References
BERGER, M. G. Inundações/Alagamentos na área Urbana de Santa Maria associado a ação antrópica e a distribuição das chuvas entre 1980 e 1995. 1999 Trabalho de Graduação (Curso de Geografia - Bacharelado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. 1999. 80p
CRISTO, SANDRO S.V.; ROBAINA, LUIS E. de S.; BERGER, MARCOS G. Análise Ambiental da bacia do Arroio Cadena, Município de Santa Maria - RS: Vila Urlândia. In: Ciência & Natura, Santa Maria, Imprensa Universitária - UFSM, 2000: 22: p 161 – 176.
MACIEL FILHO, C.L. Carta Geotécnica de Santa Maria. Imprensa Universitária, UFSM, Santa Maria, 1990.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Secretaria de Planejamento, Orçamento e Coordenação. Censo Demográfico 1996, 24 RS. Rio de Janeiro, 1996, 688p.
ROBAINA, L.E. de S.; BERGER, M.G. & MEDEIROS, E.R. Estudos dos Riscos Geológicos na Região do Município de Santa Maria: O caso da Vila Bilibiu. In: Ciência & Natura, Santa Maria, Imprensa Universitária - UFSM, 1997: 19. p 173 – 200.
SCHIMIDT, MARCUS V.C. Relações histórico-florísticas, fitossociologia e aspectos ecológicos do alecrim (holocalyx balansae mich) em floresta primária na região de Formigueiro - RS. In: Ciência & Natura, Santa Maria, Imprensa Universitária - UFSM, 15: 161-183, 1993.
SANTOS, I. dos; GIL FILHO, S. F. Ambientes Urbanos de Risco: Teorização e Método. In: VII Simpósio Bras. de Geografia Física Aplicada/I Fórum Latino-Americano de Geografia Física Aplicada. Curitiba , UFPR, Anais, 1997.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.