A educação ambiental no ambiente escolar como auxiliadora na formação de educandos cidadãos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613086189Palabras clave:
Qualidade de vida, Ambiente escolar, Educação ambiental, CidadãoResumen
O artigo discute aspectos percebidos por pesquisadoras da educação numa escola de Ensino Fundamental Municipal a respeito da Qualidade de Vida no Ambiente Escolar e que relevância estes aspectos têm na formação e construção de educandos cidadãos. Para tanto, atividades de sondagem foram primariamente desenvolvidas como questionários e brincadeiras. Posteriormente, enfatizando aspectos das áreas de Ciências Naturais, ações foram abordadas, demonstrando um desconhecimento de assuntos da Educação Ambiental, por parte dos educandos, enfraquecendo a construção de cidadãos críticos e atuantes no meio em que estão inseridos.
Descargas
Citas
DIAS, Genebaldo Freire. Educação Ambiental: Princípios e Ética. São Paulo: Gaia,1994.
DIAS, Genebaldo Freire. Educação Ambiental: Princípios e Práticas. São Paulo:Gaia, 2003.
DIDONET, Vital, 2002, texto Escola do sonho à realidade, Padrões mínimos de qualidade do ambiente escolar. http://www.tvebrasil.com.br. Acesso em: 23/02/2012.
FICAGNA, Marisa; ORTH, Miguel Alfredo. Educação para um novo cidadão: construindo possibilidades ou relações entre a teoria e a prática. In: ANDREOLA, Balduino Antonio et al. (orgs). Formação de educadores: da itinerância das universidades à escola itinerante. Ijuí: Ed. Unijuí, 2010. p. 247-259.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: Saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996
MORIN, Edgar. Os Sete Saberes Necessários à Educação do Futuro, Ed Cortez, 2001.
PERRENOUD, Philippe. A prática reflexiva no Ofício de Professor. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas Sul, 2002.
PCNs: Ciências Naturais (5ª a 8ª séries). Secretaria de Educação Fundamental,Brasília, MEC/SEF, 1998.
PCNs: Ciências Naturais. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental,Brasília, MEC/SEF, 2001. Vol 4.
PCN: Meio Ambiente. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental,Brasília, MEC/SEF, 2000.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
