Dynamics and educational games as a tool for the preservation of environmental resources
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130810950Keywords:
Education, Environmental awareness, Teaching and learningAbstract
Environmental resources are undergoing a process of decay constant and is doing a great degradation in natural ecosystems. One of the major problems of today is a lot of waste. The objective was to sensitize the students so outgoing with active classes to develop a sense of critical environmental issues in order to develop solutions to environmental problems. The work was performed at Educandário Learning to Learn, private school elementary school in the city of Bananeiras-PB. The subjects were a group of fifteen students in the 5th year of Primary school. The same occurred in the months of November to December 2012. The methodologies used were dynamic with: balloons, and fighter-word puzzle to develop environmental issues with the students. The dynamics of facilitated dialogue balloons in room encouraging them to talk, ask questions and give their opinion. Puzzles allowed students to make a reflection about the pollution of water and soil, waste that is exposed in nature, the benefits of separate collection for recycling the materials and the time it takes for some materials decompose. Moreover, the word search awoke in educating the spirit of teamwork, attitude key to behavior change society. We conclude that dynamic games and contributed to the process of recovery and formation of environmental awareness of the students, helping in changing behaviors and facilitated the assimilation of content by students so extroverted.
Downloads
References
BREDA, T. V.; PICANÇO, J. L. A educação ambiental a partir de jogos: aprendendo de forma prazerosa e espontânea. In: II SEAT – Simpósio de Educação Ambiental e Transdisciplinaridade UFG/IESA/NUPEAT, 2011, Goiânia-GO.
CARVALHO, E. M.; CHACUR, M. M. Jogo ecológico: instrumentação didática na construção de conceitos socioambientais para alunos do ensino básico. Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental vol. 28, p.274-288, 2012.
DALRI, S. A. Educação ambiental como parceria na educação tradicional: uma proposta de jogos ambientais – utilizando o lúdico e o pedagógico para a defesa do meio ambiente. ENCICLOPÉDIA BIOSFERA, Centro Científico Conhecer, GoiâniaGO, vol.6, n.9, p.1-15, 2010.
MOYLES, J. R. Só brincar? O papel do brincar na educação infantil. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2002.
SILVA, R. V. RAUBER S. C. EICKHOFF, A. P. N. BARBOSA, I. G. GUARIM NETO, G. Educação
ambiental em espaços escolarizados: um estudo de caso na escola municipal Santos Dumont Cácere
-MT, Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental vol. 26, p.61-75, 2011.
SCHUMANN, S. C.; PINHEIRO, D. K.; Novas formas de brincar respeitando a natureza: um trabalho de reciclagem na educação infantil. Monografias Ambientais vol.4, n°4, p. 607-615, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
