A PROPOSAL FOR THE USE OF WINPLOT IN THE TEACHING OF QUADRATIC FUNCTIONS IN CLASSES OF PROEJA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X14622Keywords:
Matemática, Ensino, FunçõesAbstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2179460X14622
In the light of the difficulties most first-year students at high school face regarding the learning of mathematics contents, this study proposes some activities aiming at teaching square function using the win-plot software as a tool. At the beginning these activities were designed to be applied in the first year of the PROEJA course (a high school course integrated to a technical one for adult learners) at Instituto Federal do Tocantins, however it can be useful for any student who is learning square function. The activities proposed do not intend to replace the formal and algebraic teaching of the subject, yet they aim to offer teachers and students an interesting option to build graphs in an interactive and agile way. Through graph animation tools, we intend to make some relations between the parameters and the behavior of the graph, always presenting the mathematics explanation of the relation observed at the end of the activity.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
