Environmental conscientization at municipal school of early childhood education Gente Miúda (school enviroment as a way to transformations) in Mata town- RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083366Keywords:
Education, Environment, Environmental AwarenessAbstract
Society today requires a conscious citizen, participatory and accountable in their way of life since his irresponsible lifestyle and unbridled consumerism has caused the unsustainability planet. Given this is put education as a training tool this citizen. This is fundamental to a critical and manufactures environmental education. Education is a form of social transformation and its not just an instrument for environmental and protection citizenship. Thus, environmental awareness is connected to the environment, conservation generating new principles, values and concepts for a new rationality, providing a prudent knowledge, questioning and the scientific paradigms questions based on the modern civilization. It is possible to understand environmental education as a process of building social values, knowledge and attitudes building towards environmental conservation by the community in the history course. In this context, this study aimed to verify the environmental education action developed at Municipal School of Early Childhood Education Gente Miúda Mata, RS. To carry out this research was selected bibliography which would direct the study, was developed and implemented after the survey instrument, in order to verify and analyze the approach to environmental issues in the context of the school. Thus, it was possible to identify little concern to update themselves on environmental issues and environmental education is not yet fully integrated into teaching practice, because it, taught in the school context is still being discussed little critical consciousness. This shows the relevant and urgent need for greater integration of teaching practices with social and environmental reality.Downloads
References
BOER, N. Educação Ambiental em Escolas de 1º Grau. 1993. 195 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) – Curso de Pós Graduação em Educação. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 1993.
BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais. Temas Transversais. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1998.
CARLOS, A. F. A.(Org.) A Geografia em Sala de Aula. São Paulo: Contexto, 2003.
DIAS, G. F. Educação Ambiental Princípios e Práticas. 3.ed. São Paulo: Gaia, 1994.
GIESTA, N. Tomada de decisões pedagógicas no cotidiano escolar. Porto Alegre: UFRS,1994.
MERCADO, L. P. L. Formação continuada de professores e novas tecnologias. Maceió: Edufal, 1999.
MOREIRA, A. F. Currículos e Programas no Brasil. Campinas: Papirus, 1995.
NOGUEIRA, N.R. Pedagogia dos projetos: uma jornada Interdisciplinar rumo ao desenvolvimento das múltiplas inteligências. São Paulo: Érica, 2001.
PEREIRA, A. B. Aprendendo ecologia através da educação ambiental. Porto Alegre: Sagra. 1993.
RAYS, O. A. Trabalho pedagógico: hipótese de ação didática. Santa Maria: Palotti, 2000.
REIGOTA, M. Meio ambiente e representação social. São Paulo: Cortez, 1998.
TUAN, Y. F. Topofilia. São Paulo: Difel, 1980.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
