Ações ambientais com pessoas que convivem com depressão em um Centro de Atenção Psicossocial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613082308Keywords:
Environmental education, Health, LifeAbstract
The Research on a non-formal was developed by the therapeutic workshop reading ofPsychosocial Care Center 1 (CAPS 1) Sao Sepe / RS, aiming to get through debates and groupdynamics of the election of values about the environment and an awareness of the reality of ourplanet. In addressing the situation of the environment, we can see that through simple actionssuch as use of water in a conscious way, taking care of household waste separation and thecorrect destination of the waste, among others, can contribute to the balance between man andenvironment, respect and care for life in different ways.Downloads
References
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários a prática educativa. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1996.
______. Pedagogia da esperança: um reencontro com a pedagogia do oprimido. 6. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1992.
______. Pedagogia do oprimido. 17. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1987.
______. Conscientização: teoria e prática da libertação - uma introdução ao pensamento de Paulo Freire. 3 ed. São Paulo: Moraes, 1980.
GUATTARI, F. As Três Ecologias. Campinas: Papirus Editora, 1990.
LEEF, H. Saber ambiental sustentabilidade, racional idade, complexidade, poder. Petrópolis, RJ, Vozes, 2001.
MINAYO, M.C.S; MIRANDA, A. C. Saúde e ambiente sustentável: Estreitando nós. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ, 2002.
MORIN, E. Os sete saberes necessários à educação do futuro. São Paulo: Cortez, 2000.
VASCONCELOS, E. M. Educação popular nos serviços de saúde. 2 ed., São Paulo: Hucitec, 1991.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
