Modelado do Relevo e Potencial de Fragilidade à Erosão no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9489Abstract
The exploitation of environmental resources consumes thelandscape when it generates impacts that cause its degradation. Theknowledge of the natural fragility of a place allows to evaluate thedegradation risks that an atmosphere can suffer and it also makes possibleto know the degree of tolerance that certain atmosphere can support. TheState of the Rio Grande do Sul is constituted by the provincesgeomorphologic denominated by Ross (2005) as Plateaus and Plated ofthe Basin of Paraná, Outlying Depression Sul-rio-grandense , Plateau Sulrio-grandense , Plain of Lagoa dos Patos and Lagoa Mirim . The territorywith that group present many relief forms and different types of soilsconverging for different fragility degrees. In that perspective the work hasas objective the determination and the cartographic registration, in the stateof Rio Grande do Sul, of areas with different degrees of natural fragilitystarting from the topographical resignation given by the modeled of therelief. The methodological procedures were based on the conception ofEUPS (Universal Equation of Losses of Soil) being taken as reference thetopographical factor (LS) through the rising of the modeled of the relief,obtained from the methodology proposed by Ross (1994). The factor K(erosion degree of the soil) had as reference the rising of recognition ofthe soils of the State (Brazil, 1973). The factor R (erosion degree of therain) was considered as a constant variable. The factor consideredextenuating, (C, P) were omitted the use of the earth and handling practices.The rising of the potential of natural fragility was obtained in atmosphere of SIG (System of Geographical Information) through the crossing of themap of modeled of the relief and of the map of soils. The classes fordefinition of the potential of natural fragility were contained through thetechnique of the deviation quartiles (Gerardi & Silva, 1981). The obtainedresults show the prevalence of the modeled of the relief with weak dissectionin the State, mainly in the North portion (Plateaus and Plated of the Basinof Paraná) and significant occurrences in the Southeast (Plateau Sul-riograndense).The medium dissection is shown predominant in the PlateauSul-rio-grandense. The strong dissection and very fort has prevalence inthe northeast area of the State (Plateaus and Plated of the Basin of Paraná).The flattening areas locate at the area West of the State (Plateaus and Platedof the Basin of Paraná) and the accumulation areas prevail in the OutlyingDepression Sul-rio-grandense and Plain of Lagoa dos Patos e Lagoa Mirim.The obtained map, considering the work scale adopted, shows therelationship of the modeled of the relief with the provinces geomorphologic.The fragility potential, expressed in the geographical distribution of theprovinces geomorphologic illustrates the different degrees of naturalfragility in Rio Grande do Sul.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.