Análise das feições de dissecação do relevo na folha topográfica de São Pedro do Sul - RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27229Abstract
The investigation purpose was to observe, to localize, to analyse and to catalogue the different kinds of relieve, with its area and spacial distribution, based on the relieve dissection indexes of the São Pedro do Sul-RS topographic map, using the metodology first formulated by RADAMBRASIL PROJECT (1986) and after adapted by ROSS (1992 and 1996), to the relieve dissection study. The metodology was adapted to the survey scale (1:50000) and was shawed as efficient to these types of studies. It basically consider the interfluvial dimension and the fluvial channels carving degree. The study area is located on two distincts parts: the Central Depression of the Rio Grande do Sul and the edge Rio Grande do Sul Central Depression and the Brazilian Meridional Tableland edge. The first part has mainly areas with a plane os smooth wavy and the second part with strong slope and rugged. The areas observed with less dissection degree are situated mainly at the Central Depression part, whereas the sectors that shows a bitter dissection degree are located at the tableland edge. The results obtained shows that the area has predominantly medium to weak dissection indexes.Downloads
References
ASSAD, E.D. & SANO, E.E. Sistema de Informações Geográficas: aplicações na agricultura. 2a ed. Brasília: EMBRAPA. 1999. 434p.
BERTONI, J. N & LOMBARDI, F. Conservação do solo. 3ª ed. São Paulo: CERES, 1983.
CASSETI, V. Elementos de Geomorfologia. Goiânia: Editora da UFU, 1994. 137p.
CHRISTOFOLETTI, A.; TELES, A. P.S.S.; LUPINACCI, C.M.; BERTAGNA, S.M.A.; MENDES, I.A. Morfometria do relevo na média bacia do rio Corumbataí. In: V Simpósio de Geografia Física
Aplicada. Anais. São Paulo, 1993. (137-139).
CHRISTOFOLETTI, A. Geomorfologia. 2a ed. São Paulo: Edgard Blucher, 1980. 188p.
FUNDAÇÃO INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATISTICA. Manuais técnicos em Geociências número 5. Manual Técnico de Geomorfologia. Rio de Janeiro: 1995. 112p.
GUERRA, A. J. T. & CUNHA BAPTISTA, S. (Org.). Geomorfologia: uma atualização de bases e conceitos. 2a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil. 1995.
GUERRA, A. J. T. & CUNHA BAPTISTA, S. (Org.). Geomorfologia: exercícios, técnicas e aplicações. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil. 1996. 343p.
GUERRA, A. J. T. & CUNHA BAPTISTA, S. (Org.). Geomorfologia e Meio Ambiente. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil. 1996. 372p.
MARCHETTI, D.A.B & GARCIA, G.J. Princípios de fotogrametria e fotointerpretação. São Paulo:. Nobel. 1978. 257p.
MÜLLER FILHO, I.L. Notas para estudo de Geomorfologia do Rio Grande do Sul. Santa Maria, Imprensa Universitária da UFSM, 1970. 34p. (Publicação Especial).
NOVO, E.M.L. de M. Sensoriamento Remoto: princípios e aplicações. 2a ed. Edgard Blucher. São Paulo: 1992. 308 p.
PENTEADO, M.A.M. Fundamentos de Geomorfologia. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1974. 158p.
ROSS, J.L.S. Análise empírica da fragilidade dos ambientes naturais e antropizados. In: Revista do Departamento de Geografia FFLCH - USP, no 8, São Paulo, 1994.
ROSS, J.L.S. Geomorfologia Aplicada aos Eias-Rimas. In: GUERRA, A. J. T. & CUNHA BAPTISTA, S. (Org.). Geomorfologia e Meio Ambiente. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil. 1996. 372p. (p.291-336).
ROSS, J.L.S. As Superfícies de aplanamento e os níveis Morfológicos na Bacia do Alto Paraguai - Cuiabá. In: IV Simpósio de Geografia Física Aplicada. 1991, Porto Alegre. Anais. Porto Alegre: Instituto de Geociências, 1991. p. 84-93.
SANCHEZ, M.C.; GARCIA, J.R.Y.; SOUZA, A.P.; MENDES, I.A. Sugestões para elaboração de cartas morfométricas em áreas costeiras e cristalinas. In: V Simpósio de Geografia Física Aplicada. Anais. (307-310). São Paulo, 1993.
VIEIRA, L. S. & VIEIRA, M. de Nazareth Figueiredo. Manual de Morfologia e Classificação de Solo. 2a ed. São Paulo: CERES, 1983.
VIEIRA, L.S.; SANTOS, P.C.T. dos & VIEIRA, M. de N.F. Solos: propriedades, classificação e manejo. Brasília: MEC/ABEAS, 1988.154p. (Programa Agricultura nos Trópicos, V.2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
