THE USAGE OF LEARNING RESOURCES IN THE STUDY OF DEW AND HOARFROST IN THE 6TH GRADE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Keywords:recursos didático-pedagógicos, objeto virtual de aprendizagem, fenômenos climáticos, orvalho e geada.
AbstractThe occurrence of dew and frost is a situation, accordint to the climatic rhythm, common in the southern Brazil. Most textbooks discusses this subject in a static way. This hinders that the student visualize the dynamics of the phenomenon. Given this difficulty we propose didactic teaching resources to assist the teacher in this practice and provide to the student an interation with the phenomena. Facing the possibility of the student to interact with new media related to education, the learning objects may serve as a link between these media and the teaching of climatology, specificall in the teaching of dew and frost. With the assistance of a digital video decoder (DVD) it was possible to make the lessons more dynamic and interactive, because with this instrument and the creativity of the teacher, it is possible to make the lessons, and specially geography, more attractive. Within this perspective that the present work was proposed, wich materialized in a school on the outskirts of Santa Maria, RS. Using class periods of the fifth year, these became full of cooperativeness among academics. The evaluation of the results was positive, wich shows the effectiveness of the learning object applied.
How to Cite
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.