The implementation of integrated communication and collaboration solutions through G Suite for Education along with engineering courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X43645Keywords:
Methodology, Communication, IntegrationAbstract
This article aims to describe the perception of students enrolled in the discipline Numerical Calculation, considering the use of integrated communication and collaboration solutions, using the tools of the G Suite for Education, in relation to the learning conditions, in the engineering courses offered by the University Tiradentes in the city of Aracaju in the state of Sergipe / Brazil. The results reveal that one of the biggest changes in the methodology of the class was the elimination of the delivery of printed works, which was possible with the use of Google Classroom. In addition to this change, tools that were executed through the G Suite for Education package stand out in this work. The research shows the ease of communication and interaction with the teacher and other students, the dynamics of delivery and the discussion of the results of the proposed activities. In addition to building collaborative activities, because, even though they are not physically together, student groups developed and commented on problem solving simultaneously, in the same file, in a shared and collaborative way. The research revealed that through the G Suite, students are more involved with the discipline and, consequently, with their training.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, Maria Elizabeth Bianconcini de, Educação, ambientes virtuais e interatividade. In: SILVA, Marco (org.). Educação Online. São Paulo: Loyola, 2003
ASSMANN, H. Reencantar a educação: rumo à sociedade aprendente. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1998.
CASTELLS, M. A sociedade em rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1999.
GOOGLE FOR EDUCATION. Google for Education. [s.l.]. Disponível em: https://edu.google.com/. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2019.
LÉVY, P. As novas tecnologias da inteligência: o futuro do pensamento na era da informática. Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34, 1993
GAMBOA, S. S. Pesquisa em educação: métodos e epistemologias. 2. ed. Chapecó: Argos, 2012.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.
MERCADO, L. P. Formação Continuada de Professores e Novas Tecnologias. Maceió: Edufal, 1999.
MINAYO, M. C. S. Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2001.
PRENSKY, M. Nativos Digitais, Imigrantes Digitais. De On the Horizon, NCB University Press, v.9, n. 5, out., 2001. (Tradução do artigo "Digital natives, digital immigrants", cedida por Roberta de Moraes Jesus de Souza: professora, tradutora e mestranda em educação pela UCG).
PRETI, O. Educação a distância: construindo significados. Cuiabá: NEAD/IE - UFMT, 2000.
PRETTO, N. de L. Uma escola com/sem futuro. Educação e Multimídia. Campinas: Papirus, 1996.
SALES, S. & FICHMANN, S. (2013). Redes de Aprendência: uso de tecnologias digitais e formação de professores. In: Workshop de informática na escola, 19., 2013. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira da Computação, 2013.
SIMÕES, I. A. G. (2009). A Sociedade em Rede e a Cibercultura: dialogando com o pensamento de Manuel Castells e de Pierre Lévy na era das novas tecnologias de comunicação. [S.l.]: Revista Eletrônica Temática.
SPRATT, C.; WALKER, R.; ROBINSON, B. Practitioner research and evaluation skills training in open and distance learning. Module A5: Mixed research methods. Commonwealth of Learning, 2004. Disponível em: http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/88/A5%20workbook.pdf?sequence =1&isAllowed=y. Acesso em: 13 de julho de 2022.
Published
Versions
- 2022-09-22 (2)
- 2022-07-25 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
