On the problem of moral freedom in Hume and Schopenhauer

Authors

  • Rogério Moreira Orrutea Filho Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378634040

Keywords:

Freedom, Will, Character

Abstract

In this work, we want to create a relation between Hume’s and Schopenhauer’s doctrines about the question of moral freedom. Our objective is to highlight their similarities, as well their differences. We show that in both cases, freedom appears as a general problem which includes more specific problems, especially the definition of the notions of will and character, and, formerly, both philosophers assume a position that can be equally considered as determinist. However, afterwards they pretend to overcome the determinism, and at this point their differences begin to appear. Their suggestions of overcoming of the determinism are equally shown through this article, and, at the end, we conclude that only Schopenhauer could shown a coherent solution as he associates individual human will with the notions of intelligible, empirical and acquired character

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rogério Moreira Orrutea Filho, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR

Mestrando em Filosofia pela Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL).

References

BRASIL. Decreto-lei n. 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Código Penal. Vade Mecum universitário RT. 3. ed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2011.

COSTA, Claudio. Como ser um bom compatibilista. Princípios, v. 7, n. 8. Natal, 2000.

HUME, David. Investigação acerca do entendimento humano. Tradução de Anoar Aiex. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 2004.

HUME, DAVID. Tratado da natureza humana. Tradução de Déborah Danowski. 2. ed. revista e ampliada. São

Paulo: UNESP, 2009.

JACQUETTE, Dave. The philosophy of Schopenhauer. Chesham: Acumen, 2005.

JANAWAY, Christopher. Schopenhauer’s philosophy of value. In: Better consciousness: Schopenhauer’s philosophy of value. Edited by Alex Neill and Christopher Janaway. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

KANT, Immanuel. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Werke in sechs Bänden. Band IV. Ed. de Wilhelm Weischedel. Wiesbaden: Insel, 1956.

KANT, IMMANUEL. Crítica da razão pura. Tradução de Valerio Rohden e Udo Baldur Moosburger. São Paulo:

Nova Cultural, 1999.

KOSSLER, Matthias. Life is but a mirror: on the connection between ethics, metaphysics and character in Schopenhauer. In: Better consciousness: Schopenhauer’s philosophy of value. Edited by Alex Neill and Christopher Janaway. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

MAGEE, Brian. The philosophy of Schopenhauer. Revised and enlarged edition. New York: Oxford

University Press, 2009.

PAVÃO, Aguinaldo. O mal moral em Kant. Curitiba: CRV, 2011.

SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Die Welt Als Wille und Vorstellung, II. Ed. de Arthur Hübscher. Zürich:

Diogenes, 1977.

SCHOPENHAUER, ARTHUR. O mundo como vontade e como representação. Tradução, apresentação, notas e índices de Jair Barboza. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2005.

SCHOPENHAUER, ARTHUR. Parerga und Paralipomena. Zweiter Band. Ed. de Arthur Hübscher. Zürich: Diogenes, 1977.

SCHOPENHAUER, ARTHUR. Sobre o fundamento da moral. Tradução de Maria Lúcia Mello Oliveira Cacciola. 2. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.

SCHOPENHAUER, ARTHUR. Über die Freiheit des menschlichen Willens. Ed. de Arthur Hübscher. Zurique: Diogenes, 1977.

SCHOPENHAUER, ARTHUR. Über die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes von zureichenden Grund. Ed. de Arthur Hübscher. Zürich: Diogenes, 1977.

ZAFFARONI, Eugenio Raul. PIERANGELI, José Hnrique. Manual de direito penal brasileiro, v.1,

parte geral. 7. ed. revisada e atualizada. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2007.

Published

2012-07-01

How to Cite

Orrutea Filho, R. M. (2012). On the problem of moral freedom in Hume and Schopenhauer. Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy, 3(1 e 2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378634040

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.