Measuring financial literacy: proposition of an instrument based on the Item Response Theory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X39864

Keywords:

Financial Literacy, Measuring, Item Response Theory, Scales, Behavioral Finance

Abstract

Financial literacy is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon. Thus, building a financial literacy measure has been a challenge. This study seeks to contribute to this scenario by proposing a Financial Literacy measure. The three dimensions suggested by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) are considered: financial education, financial attitude and financial behavior. For validation of the measurement, the questions were constructed and the instrument was applied in 1576 Brazilians, between November and December 2013. To evaluate the measurement, two models of the Item Response Theory were used, the unidimensional two-parameter logistic model for the Financial Knowledge scale and the Graded Response Model (GRM) for financial attitude and behavior. From the main items, five levels of financial literacy were constructed. The results pointed to the appropriateness of the proposed measure. The final instrument has thirteen questions of financial knowledge, six of financial attitude and twenty-four of financial behavior, which allow to identify the level of individual financial literacy in each of the three dimensions. From the ability scales, we found that 44.10% of respondents had average financial knowledge. In the attitude and behavior scales, the most representative level was also the median (ability between -0.5 and 0.5).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kelmara Mendes Vieira, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

Graduated in Business Administration from the Federal University of Viçosa, Master in Business Administration from Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul and PhD in Business Administration from Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Fernando de Jesus Moreira Júnior, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

Graduated in Statistics from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Master in Production Engineering from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul and PhD in Production Engineering from the Federal University of Santa Catarina

Ani Caroline Grigion Potrich, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC

 Graduated in Accounting Sciences from the Federal University of Santa Maria and in the Special Teacher Education Graduation Program for Professional Education - PEG / UFSM, Postgraduate in Business Administration from Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Master and PhD in Administration from the Federal University of Santa Maria

References

ATKINSON, A., MESSY, F. Measuring financial literacy: results of the OECD / International Network on Financial Education (INFE) pilot study, OECD Publishing.2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9csfs90fr4-en.

BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL-BCB Série cidadania financeira: estudos sobre educação, proteção e inclusão, 5ª Ed. Brasília: Banco Central do Brasil http://www.bcb.gov.br/nor/relincfin/serie_cidadania_financeira_pesquisa_infe_br_%200443_2017.pdf. 2017, Acessed 06 jun. 2018.

BAKER, F. B. The basics of item response theory. 2001, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED458219.pdf. Acessed 15 jun. 2016.

BEATON, A. E., ALLEN, N. L. Interpreting scales through scale anchoring. Journal of Educational Statistics. 1992, 17, 191-204.

BIRNBAUM, A. Some Latent Trait Models and Their Use in Infering an Examinee’s Ability. In: Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.1968.

BUCHER-KOENEN, T., LUSARDI, A., ALESSIE, R., VAN ROOIJ, M. How Financially Literate Are Women? An Overview and New Insights. Journal of Consumer Affairs.2016, 51, 255–283.

CHEN, H., VOLPE, R. P. An analysis of personal financial literacy among college students. Financial Services Review, 1998, 7 (2), 107-128.

CLARK, R., LUSARDI, A., MITCHELL, O. S Employee Financial Literacy and Retirement Plan Behavior: A Case Study. NBER Working Paper n. 21461.2015, http://www.nber.org/papers/w21461. Acessed 21 feb 2016.

EMBRETSON, S. , REISE, S. P. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers 2000.

FAZIO, R. H., EISER, J. R., SHOOK, N. J. Attitude formation through exploration: Valence asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.,2004, 87, 293-311.

JUNIOR, Fernando de Jesus Moreira. Contribuições da Teoria da Resposta ao Item nas Avaliações Educacionais. Ciência e Natura, v. 36, p. 58-72, 2014.

LORENZO-SEVA, U. , FERRANDO, P. J. Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 2017, 29(2), 236-240.

GERRANS, P. & HEANEY, R. A The Role of Undergraduate Personal Finance Education in Financial Literacy, Financial Attitudes and Financial Behaviours. Social Sciense Research Network. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.25373 Acessed 29 feb. 2016.

KADOYA, Y., KHAN, M.S.R. What determines financial literacy in Japan? Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 2019, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747218000379.

KLAPPER, L., LUSARDI, A. , PANOS, G. A. Financial literacy and its consequences: Evidence from Russia during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2013, 37(10), 3904–3923 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.014.

KNOLL, M. A. Z., HOUTS, C. R. The financial knowledge scale: an application of item response theory to the assessment of financial literacy. The Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2012, 46(3), 381-410 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2012.01241.x.

LUSARDI, A., MITCHELL, O. S. Financial literacy and retirement planning in the United States. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance. 2011, 10(4), 509-525.

LUSARDI, A., MITCHELL, O. S. The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 2014, 52(1), 5-44.

LUSARDI, A., OGGERO N. , YAKOBOSKI P. J. The TIAA Institute-GFLEC Personal Finance Index: A New Measure of Financial Literacy. Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center (GFLEC), 2017. Disponível em: http://gflec.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/TIAA_GFLEC_Report_PFinIndex_final2.pdf?x87657. Acesso em: 18 jul.. 2019.

MESSY, F., MONTICONE, C. Financial Education Policies in Asia and the Pacific. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2016, n. 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jm5b32v5vvc-en Acessed 23 Feb. 2016.

NATIONAL FINANCIAL CAPABILITY STUDY (NFCS) Financial Capability in the United States - Report of Findings from the 2012 National Financial Capability Study.2013, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Investor Education Foundation.

O’NEILL, B. , XIAO, J. Financial Behaviors Before and After the Financial Crisis: Evidence from an Online Survey. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning. 2012, 23(1), 33-46.

OPLETALOVÁ, A. (2015) Financial education and financial literacy in the Czech education system. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 171(16), 1176-1184.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). : Women and Financial Education: Evidence, Policy Responses and Guidance, OECD Publishing., 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9 789264202733-en Acessed 25 may. 2018.

____________: 2015 OECD/INFE Toolkit for Measuring Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion. OECD Publishing. 2015, http://www.oecd.org/daf/fin/financial-education/2015_OECD_INFE_Toolkit_Measuri ng_Financial_Literacy.pdf. Acessed e 24 Feb 2016.

____________: PISA 2015 Results in Focus. OECD Publishing. 2018, http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf. Acessed 30 May 2018.

___________: 2017 (OECD). G20/OECD INFE report on adult financial literacy in G20 countries. [s.l: s.n.]. 2017, Disponível em: http://www.oecd.org/daf/fin/financial-education/G20-OECD-INFE-report-adult-financial-literacy-in-G20-countries.pdf. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2019.

PARTCHEV, I. Package irtoys: Simple interface to the estimation and plotting of IRT models. CRAN. R Project 2016, . http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irtoys/irtoys.pdf Acessed 24 May. 2017.

PIETRAS, G. Uma abordagem sobre matemática financeira e educação financeira no ensino médio. 2014, 104 f. Dissertação (Mestre em Matemática), Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa.

POTRICH, A. C. P., VIEIRA, K. M., KIRCH, G. Determinants of Financial Literacy: Analysis of the Influence of Socioeconomic and Demographic Variables. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças. 2015, 26(69), 362-377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201501040.

POTRICH, A. C. G. VIEIRA, K. M., CORONEL, D. A., Bender Filho, R.. Financial literacy in Southern Brazil: Modeling and invariance between genders. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, v. 6, p. 1-12, 2015a.

POTRICH, A. C. G., VIEIRA, K. M., MENDES-DA-SILVA, W. Development of a financial literacy model for university students. Management Research Review, v. 39, n. 3, p. 356-376, 2016a.

POTRICH, A. C. P., VIEIRA, K. M., KIRCH, G. Are you Financially Literate? Discover in the Financial Literacy BASE - Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos. 2016, 13(2), 153-170 http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/base.2016.132.05.

POTRICH, A.C.G., VIEIRA, K.M., KIRCH, G. How well do women do when it comes to financial literacy? Proposition of an indicator and analysis of gender differences. Journal Behavioral and Experimental. Finance. 2018, 17, 28–41 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBEF.2017.12.005.

QFINANCE. Definition of attitude. QFinance - The Ultimate Financial Resource. 2013, http://www.qfinance.com/dictionary/attitude Acessed 15 Sep 2015.

R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,2017, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ Acessed 24 May 2018.

RECKASE, M. D. Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics. 1979, 4, 207-230.

RIZOPOULOS, D. ltm:An r packages for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses. R package.2015, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ltm/ltm.pdf Acessed 24 May 2018.

SAMEJIMA, F. A. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric 1969, Monograph. 17.

SCHMEISER, M. D., SELIGMAN, J. S.: Using the Right Yardstick : Assessing Financial Literacy Measures by Way of Financial Well-Being. The Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2013, v. 47(2), 243-262 https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12010.

SHOCKEY, S. S. Low-wealth adults financial literacy. Money management behavior and associates factors, including critical thinking. Tese, 2002,University of Utah, United States.

SZELES, M.R., FUSCO, A. Item response theory and the measurement of deprivation: evidence from Luxembourg data. Quality & Quantity.2013, 47(3), 1545-1560 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9607-x.

VAN ROOIJ, M. C. J, LUSARDI, A., ALESSIE, R. J. M. Financial Literacy and retirement planning in the Netherlands. Journal of Economic Psychology.2011, 32(4), 593-608.

XUE, R., GEPP, A., O’NEILL, T.J., STERN, S., VANSTONE, B.J. Financial literacy amongst elderly Australians. Accounting & Finance. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12362.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-29

How to Cite

Vieira, K. M., Moreira Júnior, F. de J., & Potrich, A. C. G. (2020). Measuring financial literacy: proposition of an instrument based on the Item Response Theory. Ciência E Natura, 42, e38. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X39864

Issue

Vol. 42 (2020): Edição especial de aniversário 10 ANOS - bacharelado e 30 - especialização em estatística

Section

10 anos estatística bacharelado

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>