School as a means of training for the applicability of environmental education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083923Keywords:
Environmental Education, Applicability, SchoolAbstract
This study was aimed to analyze the importance and development of environmental issues in schools. The theme of Environmental Education was chosen with the intention of analyzing the environmental initiatives undertaken by pupils in their homes and at school where they study. The activity was developed in a public school in Porto Alegre / RS and was the work of three (3) classes of elementary school. For a more detailed analysis on their perceptions and actions wrapped in the environment, a questionnaire was administered to five (5) questions involving his actions at school and in their homes, as well as their knowledge on the subject. With answers and arguments about their environmentally friendly attitudes, we see that actions that contribute to the environment are carried out, but still without a full or a grand interest for certain students. With the critical perception surfacing, we hope to get a better world ahead.Downloads
References
ANTUNES, P. B.. Direito Ambiental. 4ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris, 2000.
BECK, U. La sociedade del riesgo: hacia uma nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós, 2006.
BRASIL. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: Temas Transversais: Meio ambiente. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental - MEC/SEF, 1997.
BRASIL. Lei 9795/99. Dispõe sobre a educação ambiental, institui a Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental. Brasília: DF. 1999.
BORGES, R. M.R; BASSO, N. R. S; FILHO, J. B. R. Avaliação e Interatividade na Educação Básica em Ciências e Matemática. 2008. Porto Alegre. EDIPUCRS. 184p.
BORGES, R. M.R; BASSO, N. R. S; FILHO, J. B. R. Propostas Interativas na Educação Científica e Tecnológica. 2008. Porto Alegre. EDIPUCRS. 176p.
DEMO, P. Educar pela Pesquisa. 2007. Campinas. Autores Associados. 130p.
CURRIE, K. Meio ambiente: Interdisciplinaridade na prática. Campinas. SP: Papirus, 1998.
FERNANDES, I. S.. Metodologia para trabalhos científicos. Goiânia, GO: Impresso Digital, 2010.
FRIEDRICH, M. O Programa Nacional de Inclusão de Jovens – PROJOVEM: Uma Análise Entre o Proposto e o Vivido em Goiânia. Dissertação de Mestrado, UFG, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.sistemasconsultoria.com.br/mecm/Diss_MarciaFriedrich.pdf.
GADOTTI, M. Escola Cidadã, Cidade Educadora: Projetos e práticas em processo. V Fórum de Educação CEAP. Salvador, 23 de outubro de 2003.
GOOGLE MAPS. Localização de endereço. Disponível em: http://maps.google.com.br/maps?hl=pt- BR&tab=wl. Acesso
em: 27/05/2009.
GRÜN, M. Ética e Educação Ambiental: a conexão necessária. Campinas: Papirus, 1996.
JACOBI, P. Educação ambiental, cidadania e sustentabilidade. In: Cadernos de Pesquisa, nº118. São Paulo: Fundação Carlos Chagas, 2003. Pp 189-205.
KOFF, E. D. A Questão Ambiental e o estudo de Ciências: algumas atividades. Goiânia, GO: Editora UFG, 1995.
LUDKE, Menga, ANDRÉ, Marli E. D. A.. Pesquisa em Educação: abordagens qualitativas. São Paulo. EPU: 1986.
LUNDGREN, U. Teoria del curriculum y escolarización. Madri: Morata, 1992.
MARCONI, M. A.; LAKATOS, E. M. Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2003.
PIKUNAS, J. Desenvolvimento humano. São Paulo: Hill do Brasil, 1979.
REMEA. Implementação da Educação Ambiental em Escolas: uma reflexão. Disponível em: http://www.remea.furg.br/mea/remea/vol4c/daniel.htm. Acesso em: 03/06/2009.
SAITO. C. H. Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental: Desafios Contemporâneos. In: RUSCHEINSKY, A. Educação Ambiental. Abordagens Múltiplas. Porto Alegre, Artmed, 2002.
RUSCHEINSKY, A. Educação Ambiental. Abordagens Múltiplas. Porto Alegre, Artmed, 2002.
SAGAN, C. B. e B.. Reflexões sobre a vida e morte na virada do milênio. Cia. das Letras, 1998, São Paulo.
STERLING, S. “Education in Change”. In: HUCKLE, J. and STERLING, S. Education for sustainability. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 1996. Pp. 18- 39.
UNESCO. Declaração de Hamburgo sobre a Educação de Adultos e Plano de Ação para o Futuro. In: Conferencia Internacional Sobre a educação de Adultos, 1997, Hamburgo, Alemanha, 14-18 jul. 1997. VYGOTSKY, L. A formação
social da mente. Livraria Mar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
