Difusão de material informativo sobre o descarte de resíduos radiológicos entre acadêmicos de odontologia e cirurgiões-dentistas da região Sul do Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083317Keywords:
Dental waste, Environmental impactAbstract
The radiologic material used in dental offices products environmental hazard if not disposedproperly, because the silver, present in chemical solutions used during the development process, isconsidered toxic to humans. The management of Health Services is the process to minimizing theadverse effects caused by toxic waste, reducing the environmental impact. The healthprofessionals knowledge about the disposal process is very important, in order to developingawareness in the academic environment. This study aims to disseminating information on theWaste Management of Health Services among dental students and dentists. In this sense, it wasdeveloped posters and leaflets about the environmental impact caused by the incorrect radiological waste disposal and waste management of Health Services, and distributed in theFederal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Dentistry University and Dental Offices and in the citiesof Florianópolis, SC. The leaflets were distributed in one hundred offices, and six posters weredistributed in community colleges. Orientation programs are necessary to promote professionaleducation and awareness about the appropriate approach to waste disposal, as well as theenvironmental impact caused by its breach.Downloads
References
Gerenciamento dos resíduos de serviços de saúde”. 2006. Disponível em: www.anvisa.gov.br. Acesso em: 01/06/2011, às 19:00.
BORTOLETTO, E.C.; TAVARES, C.R.G.; BARROS, M.A.S.D.; CARLI, C.M. “Caracterização da geração e da qualidade do efluente líquido gerado no laboratório de raio-x da clínica odontológica do Hospital Universitário de Maringá”. In: VI CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENGENHARIA QUÍMICA EM INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA. Anais, 2005.
BRASIL, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução - ANVISA. RDC nº 306, de 07 de dezembro de 2004.
FERNANDES, G.S.; AZEVEDO, A.C.P.; CARVALHO, A.C.P.; PINTO, M.L.C. “Análise e gerenciamento de efluentes de serviços de radiologia”. Radiol Bras. v.38, n.5, p. 355-358, 2005.
FERNANDES, M.F. “Conhecimento dos formandos em odontologia sobre o gerenciamento de resíduos de serviços de saúde- aspectos éticos e legais”. Monografia apresentada para obtenção do Título de Especialista em Odontologia Legal, Unicamp, 2009.
GARCIA, L.P.; ZANETTI-RAMOS, B.G. “ Gerenciamento dos resíduos de serviços de saúde: uma questão de biossegurança”. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 20(3):744-752, 2004.
HOCEVAR, C.M.; RODRIGUEZ, M.T.R. “Avaliação do impacto ambiental gerado por efluentes fotográficos, gráficos e radiológicos em Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil”. Eng Sanit Amb. v . 7, n. 3 e 4, p.139-143, 2002.
LIPPEL, M.; BAASCH, S. “Modelo de gerenciamento de resíduos sólidos de saúde para pequenos geradores: O caso de Blumenau/ SC”. Dissertação apresentada ao programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência e Engenharia de Produção,UFSC; 2003.
MACIEL, V.C.; LIU A.S.; CARDOSO P.G. “Tratamento do resíduo de prata de fixador radiográfico dental”. In: IX Encontro Latino Americano de Iniciação Científica e V Encontro Latino Americano de Pós- Graduação, 2004.
MAMELUQUE, S.; PORDEUS, I.A.; NOGUEIRA-MOREIRA, A.; MAGALHÃES, C.S. “Gerenciamento dos resíduos gerados nos consultórios odontológicos na cidade de Montes Claros”. ABO Nac; 15(4), 2007.
OLIVEIRA P.C. “ Avaliação dos níveis de poluição ambiental dos serviços com radiologia odontológica na cidade de Itabuna – Bahia”. Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- graduação em Desenvolvimento Regional e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz; 2006.
PIRES, T.S.L.; GOULART, F.; LESSEI, J.; FELISBINO, J.; SOLONYNSKA, M. “A gestão dos resíduos de serviços de saúde como compromisso ambiental no curso superior de tecnologia em Radiologia”. 2010. Disponível em: www.sbpcnet.org.br. Acesso em: 10/06/11, às 10:00.
Portal da saúde. Disponível em: www.portal.saude.gov.br. Acesso em: 10/06/11, às 15:00.
RAMALHO, L.; UHLMANN, V.O.; PFITSCHER, E.D.; RABELO, E.C. “Avaliação da sustentabilidade dos aspectos e impactos ambientais de seriços odontológicos: Um estudo de caso”. Reflexão Contábil, Vol. 29(1) , 2010.
SANTOS PEREIRA, N.R. “Levantamento das condições de biossegurança em radioproteção nos consultórios odontológicos de Campo Grande/MS”. Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós – graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Convênio Rede Centro-Oeste; 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
