Produção de um portal educacional para ensinar e aprender conceitos sobre ambiente e radiações na Educação Básica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613082289Keywords:
Environmental education, Participant Research, Value Theory and PracticeAbstract
This work seeks to check the effects of participation research in the making of a curriculum andpedagogical practices in school environment at Escola Estadual de Ensino Médio Paulo Freire. Thus,the following specific goals are to be analyzed: discuss the concepts of Environment Educationadopted by Brazilian Education managers; describe the historical/social context that contributed forthe school to choose the participation research methodology and to present the view of teachersthat took part in the preparation of the PPP about the effects of the participation research in themaking of the curriculum and the pedagogical practices in Environment Education. The research wasdone using the quality bibliographic method. The investigation showed that that there is a great gapbetween the pedagogical message and the educational practice, as well as what meaningful changesin education need structural and financial support of the managers. On the other hand, someadvances in the every day activities of the school investigated were found, as for example: theunderstanding of the environment education concept as inter-curricular, the understanding of theneed to contribute to the formation of citizenship, the recognition of the importance of knowing thereality of the student, the understanding of the need to contextualize local problems and try to solvethem, the perception of the importance of a teacher becoming a researcher, the highlight of participation methodologies, the evaluation of a descriptive statement and the fact that the subjectshave the same time in the curriculum.Downloads
References
BRANDÃO, Carlos Rodrigues. Repensando a Pesquisa Participante. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1999.
CAPRA, Fritjof. A teia da vida: uma nova compreensão científica dos sistemas vivos. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1996.
DAL MORO, Selina Maria. O prometido e o realizado: da construção à realização da Constituinte escolar. Disponível em:http://www.isecure.com.br/anpae/410.pdf. Acesso em: 12 set. de 2009.
FERRARO-JUNIOR, L. A. (Coord.) Encontros e Caminhos: formação de educadoras(es) ambientais e coletivos educadores. Brasília: MMA, Diretoria de Educação
Ambiental, 2005.
JACOBI, Pedro Roberto; TRISTÃO, Martha; GONÇALVES, Maria Isabel Correa Franco. A Função social da Educação Ambientais nas práticas colaborativas: Participação e engajamento. Cad. Cedes, Campinas, vol. 29, n. 77, p. 63-79, jan./abr. 2009.
LAYRARGUES, Philippe Pomier (coord.). Identidades da educação ambiental brasileira / Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Diretoria de Educação Ambiental; Brasília:
Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2004.
LIMA, Gustavo Ferreira da Costa. Educação, emancipação e sustentabilidade: em de uma pedagogia libertadora para a defesa ambiental educação. In: LAYRARGUES, Philippe Pomier (coord.). Identidades da educação ambiental brasileira. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Diretoria de Educação
Ambiental; Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2004.
LOUREIRO, Carlos Frederico Bernardo. Educação ambiental transformadora. In: LAYRARGUES, Philippe Pomier (coord.). Identidades da educação ambiental brasileira. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Diretoria de Educação Ambiental; Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2004.
QUINTAS, José Silva. Educação no processo de gestão ambiental: uma de educação ambiental transformadora e proposta emancipatória. In: LAYRARGUES, Philippe Pomier (coord.). Identidades da educação ambiental brasileira / Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Diretoria de Educação Ambiental;
Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2004.
SANTIAGO, Anna Rosa. “Projeto Político-Pedagógico: Escola Básica e a Crise de Paradigmas”. In: Conferência Nacional de Educação para Todos. Anais. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1994.
SANTOS, Akiko. Complexidade e transdisciplinaridade em educação: cinco princípios para resgatar o elo perdido. Revista Brasileira de Educação v. 13 n. 37 jan./abr. 2008.
TOURAINE, Alain. A crítica da modernidade. Petrópolis – RJ: Vozes, 1994.
TOZONI – REIS, Marilia Freitas e Campos (org). A pesquisa-ação-participativa em educação ambiental: reflexões teóricas. São Paulo: Annablume, 2007.
VIÉGA, Aline. Complexidade: uma palavra com muitos sentidos. In: FERRAROJUNIOR, L. A. (Coord.) Encontros e Caminhos: formação de educadoras(es) ambientais e coletivos educadores. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Diretoria de Educação Ambiental, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
