Environmental Education and playful-activities: an incentive to change habits in the generation of waste
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818806Keywords:
Solid waste, Reduction, Recycling, Elementary schoolAbstract
One of the goals of environmental education is to sensitize the population to become an informed and concerned people with the environment and its problems. Given this fact, in order to draw attention of the participants of the activities of the Ecological Cantonment as the perceived amount of waste produced and discarded by them, this paper proposed a practice called “gymkhana trash” where students from (5th year of the Municipal School of Curitiba from 9 to 12 years), should dispose of waste correctly in the dumps, there was a discussion about the rights and wrongs. Participants were also caused and observed during the activity and from the results obtained there was the need to work the theme not only in school but, together with the family, because despite all the campaigns in the media to sensitize the population on the production of waste, the practice of people are still far from the expected results, therefore we must invest in activities that seek to change habits and we can achieve this goal through games and hands-on activities that are part of students' everyday elementary school.Downloads
References
Abralatas - Associação Brasileira dos Fabricantes de Latas de Alta Reciclabilidade [Internet] (BR) [cited 2015 jul 15] MUNDO: Índices de reciclagem da lata de alumínio para bebidas – 1991 a 2013 (em %) Available from: http://www.abralatas.org.br/grafico/grafico-8/
Alves, J. D. O luxo da casa do lixo: moradia e sustentabilidade. Goiânia: Ed da PUC Goiás; 2010.
Barbosa S. – 2000 – Classificação [Internet]. Lixo consciência sócio ambiental Jun 00 [cited 2013 Jul 8] Available from:
http://www.lixo.com.br/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=143&Itemid=
Bertoldo G, Lima DM. Levantamento sobre a separação de lixo na UTFPR - Câmpus Dois Vizinhos. In: II Seminário de Extensão e Inovação SEI'2012 [Internet]; 2012 set 17; Paraná, Brasil. 2012 [cited 2015 jul 03]. available at: http://www.sei.utfpr.edu.br/images/arquivos_2012/LEVANTAMENTO%20SOBRE%20A%20SEPARA%C3%87%C3%83O%20D %20LIXO%20NA%20UTFPR%20%E2%80%93%20C%C3%82MPUS%20DOIS%20VIZINHOS.pdf
Bidone FRA. Programa de pesquisa em saneamento básico. Metodologias e técnicas de minimização, reciclagem e reutilização de resíduos sólidos urbanos. Rio de Janeiro: ABES. 1999
Bosa CR. Franco JRS. Silva MET. Moraes SRM. Educação Ambiental: caminhos para mudar. Curitiba. Revista Acadêmica, 2007 v.5, n. 4, p. 425-435.
Bosa CR. Sobota AR. Educação Ambiental: no acantonamento ecológico, Curitiba, Paraná. Revista Monografias Ambientais [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2013 ago 13] v. 2, n. 2 (2011) Author’s manuscript available at: http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/remoa/article/view/2651
Brasil. Lei 9.795, de 27 de abril de 1999. Publicada no Diário Oficial da União em 28 de abril de 1999
Comini GS. Honda IM. Fernandes JC. Maciel MSD. Digressão sobre a inserção da variável sustentabilidade socioambiental no planejamento estratégico das organizações. CEFET/RJ-CSF. Revista Tenda, 2007, n. 3.
Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente – CONAMA. Resolução CONAMA nº 275. Estabelece o código de cores para os diferentes tipos de resíduos. (Brasil): CONAMA 2001.
Dias GF. Educação Ambiental: Princípios e Práticas. São Paulo: Gaia. 2003.
Grippi S. Lixo: reciclagem e sua história: um guia para as prefeituras brasileiras. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência. 2001.
Kreppner K. [The child and the family: Interdependence in developmental pathways]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 2000, 16(1), 11-22.
Mafaldo MFG. Pinheiro KD. Ensinando técnicas de reciclagem, reutilização e redução dos resíduos sólidos urbanos para alunos do 4º ano do ensino fundamental da E E E F , Eduardo Vargas em Alegrete/RS. Revista Monografias Ambientais [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2013 jul 08] v. 3, n. 3 (2011) available at: http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/remoa/article/view/3044/1824
Muniz C. – 2014 – Comunidade escolar será envolvida em programa de educação para sustentabilidade [internet]. Secretaria Municipal da Educação de Curitiba; [cited 2015 mar 7] Available from http://www.cidadedoconhecimento.org.br/cidadedoconhecimento/index.php?subcan=7&cod_not=41046
Rodrigues FL. Cavinatto MV. Lixo: De onde vem? Para onde vai? (2ª Ed) São Paulo: moderna 2003.
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Recursos hídricos (SEMA): Desperdício zero: comece não desperdiçando esta ideia. Paraná (Brasil): Governo do Estado do Paraná, 2009.
Simonetto EO, Borenstein D. Gestão operacional da coleta seletiva de resíduos sólidos urbanos – abordagem utilizando um sistema de apoio à decisão. Gest. Prod.[Internet]. 2006 [cited 2015 jul 03]; vol.13, n.3 Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2006000300008&lng=en&nrm=iso
Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ). Departamento de Zoologia, UFPR Curitiba, PR. 2012 Boletim informativo Número 103
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
