The Program Manager of Guard Animals in Curitiba and your application in Cantonment Ecological
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083640Keywords:
Animal abandonment, Environmental Education, MicrochipAbstract
Many animals are abandoned and maltreated. In Brazil and the world there are animals of defense programs. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the Program of Responsible Animal Guardian of the City of Curitiba and see if after carrying out activities of marionettes and delivery of the booklet through the use of questionnaires before and after testing the children participated in the Ecological Cantonment, assimilated the importance of responsible ownership. Questionnaires were administered to 126 students. In answering the pretest questionnaire on what they understood by responsible pet ownership 59 of the 93 students analyzed at this stage (the ones with pet) responded that was quality of life of the animal. After the activities in the post-test questionnaire with the participation of 126 students, 118 responded correctly on what responsible pet ownership and animal welfare. With respect to microchip and register only 90 students understood how to do it, demonstrating that the approach to this particular topic should be reconsidered. In other aspects the approach used by the program proved to be efficient and able to sensitize students to the understanding that pets deserve respect and quality of life.Downloads
References
Azevedo, J.G. Domesticação dos animais [Acesso em: 28. abr. 2011]. Bahia. 2002. Disponível em: http://www.ufrb.edu.br/lea/index2.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=32&Itemid= 7.
Brasil, Legislação Federal do Brasil – Lei federal de crimes ambientais n° 9.605/98 [Acesso em: 25. Jul. 2010]. Brasília, DF; 1998. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil/L9605.htm.
Broom, D. M.; Molento, C.F. Bem estar animal: conceito e questões relacionadas. [Acesso em: 04. Mai. 2011]. Curitiba, 2004 - Arquives of Veterinary Science, v.9, n.2, p.1-11- Disponível em: http://www.freewebs.com/hotzel/Molento2004.pdf.
Levai, F. L. Crueldade consentida: a violência humana contra os animais e o papel do ministério público no combate a tortura institucionalizada. [Acesso em 27. Jan. 2011]. São José dos Campos; 2007 – Disponível em:
http://terraverdeviva.com.br/crueldadeconsentida.pdf.
Molento, C.F. Senciência animal. [Acesso em: 06. Mai. 2011] Conselho Regional de Medicina Veterinária do Paraná, Curitiba; 2006. Disponível em: http://www.labea.ufpr.br/publicacoes/pdf/P%E1ginas%20Iniciais%202%20Senci%EAncia.pdf.
Rollin, B. (Traduzido por Larissa H. Rüncos e Carla FM Molento) – Dor animal: o que é e porque importa? [Acesso em: 29. abr. 2011]. Curitiba; 2003. Disponível em:
Santana, L.R.; Oliveira, T. P. – Guarda responsável e dignidade dos animais – [Acesso em: 21. Jul. 2010]. Bahia; 2004. Disponível em: http://www.nipeda.direito.ufba.br/guardaresponsaveledgnidadedosaniais.pdf.
Santana, H. J. Abolicionismo animal. [Acesso em 21. jul. 2010]. Bahia; 2004. Disponível em: http://www.abolicionismoanimal.org.br/artigos/abolicionismoanimal.pdf.
Silvano, D.; Bendas, J. R.; Miranda, M. G.; Pinhão, R.; Mendes-de-Almeida, F.; Labarthe, N. V.; Paiva, J. P. Divulgação dos princípios da guarda responsável: uma vertente possível no trabalho de pesquisa a campo – [ Acesso em: 4. mai. 2011]. Rio de Janeiro, 2010. Revista Eletrônica Novo Enfoque, v. 09, n. 09, p. 64 – 86. Disponível em: http://www.castelobranco.br/sistema/novoenfoque/files/09/artigos/06.pdf.
Souza, M. F. Primeira reunião latino-americana de especialistas em posse de animais de companhia e controle de
populações. 2003. Set. 01 a 03. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2003.
Schneider, B. T.; Souza, C. Aspectos éticos da experimentação animal. [Acesso em 06. mai. 2011]. Minas Gerais, 2003. Revista Brasileira Anestesiol 53: 2: 278 – 285. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/%0D/rba/v53n2/v53n2a14.pdf.
Tradd, M. E.; Brasil, L. G.; Bregenski, M. A. et al. –[Acesso em 29. Abr. 2011]. Curitiba, 2009. - Resumo do plano de defesa e proteção animal da Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba. Disponível em: http://www.protecaoanimal.curitiba.pr.gov.br.
Viaro, O., Santos, B. M., Vasconcellos, A. S.; Pinheiro, R. S. Impacto educativo do modulo cães e gatos do projeto “para viver de bem com os bichos”. [Acesso em: 06. mai. 2011]. São Paulo, 2010 - Revista Veterinária e Zootecnia, dezembro, 17 (4): 502-506. Disponível em: http://www.fmvz.unesp.br/ojs/index.php/rvz/article/view/53/70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
