Typical rural work accidents: a study of records from the University Hospital Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130814190Keywords:
Occupational hazards, Agricultural activities, Rural worker, Profile and Rural ExtensionAbstract
The rural work is considered one of the most vulnerable to accidents, having in view the quantity and diversity of occupational risks involved. Despite the importance of the issue, is limited to scientific literature dedicated to its analysis. The aim of the present study was to delineate the profile of rural workers accidented and characterize the accidents. For this reason, a survey was conducted using the documentary records of health problems of the University Hospital Santa Maria (UFSM). The sample with 38 records was composed of non-probabilistic criteria and the collected data were analyzed quantitatively using the software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The profile trace to worker injured rural is characterized by white men and adults, with a low level of schooling, autonomous, experienced workers and residents in rural. The typical rural accidents are characterized by spatial variability (different municipalities) and by temporal concentration during the period of harvest. Caused by occupational hazards biological, ergonomic and mechanics, are mainly caused by falls and affect, in particular, lower limbs and chest and upper limbs, leading to temporary inability of rural workers. The magnitude of this social problem points to the need for intervention by the Rural Extension and perform more specific searches.
Downloads
References
AMBROSI, J. N.; MAGGI, M. F. Acidentes de trabalho relacionados às atividades agrícolas. Acta Iguazu, Cascavel, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-13, 2013. Disponível em: http://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/actaiguazu/article/view/7887. Acesso em: 9 dez. 2013.
BRUNI, A. L. SPSS aplicado à pesquisa acadêmica. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
CORREA, I. M.; RAMOS, H. H. Acidentes rurais. Cultivar Máquinas, Pelotas, ano 3, n. 16, p. 24-25, jan./fev. 2003. Disponível em: http://www.grupocultivar.com.br/site/content/artigos/artigos.php?id=458. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2013.
DWYER, T. Acidentes do trabalho: em busca de uma nova abordagem. Revista de Administração de Empresas, São Paulo, v. 29, n. 2, p. 19 – 31, abr./jun. 1989. Disponível em: http://rae.fgv.br/sites/rae.fgv.br/files/artigos/10.1590_S0034-75901989000200003.pdf. Acesso em: 16 out. 2013.
GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6 ed. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2011.0
GOMEZ, C. M.; THEDIM-COSTA, S. M. da F. Precarização do trabalho e desproteção social: desafios para a saúde coletiva. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 4, n. 2, p. 411-421, 1999. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81231999000200015. Acesso em: 17 out. 2013.
FEHLBERG, M. F.; SANTOS, I. S. dos; TOMASI, E. Acidentes de trabalho na zona rural de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil: um estudo transversal de base populacional. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 17, n. 6, p. 1375 – 1381, nov./dez. 2001. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2001000600021. Acesso em: 17 out. 2013.
FONTANELLA, B. J. B.; RICAS, J.; TURATO, E. R. Amostragem por saturação em pesquisas qualitativas em saúde: contribuições teóricas. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 24, n. 1, p. 17-27, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2008000100003. Acesso em: 28 nov. 2013.
FUNDAÇÃO DE ECONOMIA E ESTATÍSTICA – FEE. Dados anuais para unidade geográfica Mesorregião Centro Ocidental Rio-Grandense. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.fee.rs.gov.br/feedados/consulta/frame_consREM.asp?param=Mesorregiao/Centro%20Ocidental%20Rio-Grandense/2010. Acesso em: 4 dez. 2013.
JESUS, C. S. de; BRITO, T. A. Estudo dos acidentes de trabalho no meio rural: análise dos processos e condições de trabalho. Revista Saúde.Com, v. 5, n. 2, p. 141-146, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.uesb.br/revista/rsc/v5/v5n2a07.pdf. Acesso em: 22 out. 2013.
KIRCHHOF, A. L. C. et al. Os acidentes de trabalho atendidos em pronto-atendimento de hospital universitário. Escola Anna Nery Revista de Enfermagem, v. 7, n. 3, p. 361 – 368, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=127718223008. Acesso em: 17 out. 2013.
POUPART, J. et al. (org). A pesquisa qualitativa: enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos. Tradução de Ana Cristina Nasser. 2 ed. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2010.
ROBAZZI, M. L. do C. C. et al. Acidentes de trabalho identificados em prontuários hospitalares. Ciência, cuidado e saúde, v. 5, n. 3, p. 289 – 298, set./dez. 2006. Disponível em: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/CiencCuidSaude/article/.../3251. Acesso em: 17 out. 2013.
SILVA, J. R. et al. Acidentes graves no trabalho rural entre 1994 e 1997 na região centro-sul do estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Instituto Florestal, São Paulo, v. 13, n.1, p. 83-97, 2001. Disponível em: http://www.iflorestal.sp.gov.br/publicacoes/revista_if/RIF13-1/p.83-97.pdf/. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2014.
SILVEIRA, C. A.; ROBAZZI, M. L. do C. C.; MARZIALE, M. H. P.; DALRI, M.C. B. Acidente de trabalho entre trabalhadores rurais e da agropecuária identificados através de registros hospitalares. Ciência, cuidado e saúde, v. 4, n. 2, p. 120 – 128, maio/ago. 2005. Disponível em: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/CiencCuidSaude/article/.../5221. Acesso em: 17 out. 2013.
STÉDILE, S. Agricultura de grupo em Santa Catarina: o caso específico de Condomínios e Associações Leiteiras no Oeste. 2005. 111f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agroecossistemas) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.pgagr.cca.ufsc.br/arquivos%20PGA/dissertacoes/diss2005/stedile_sergio.pdf. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2013.
TEIXEIRA, M. L. P.; FREITAS, R. M. V. de. Acidentes do trabalho rural no interior paulista. São Paulo em Perspectiva, v. 17, n. 2, p. 81-90, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/spp/v17n2/a09v17n2.pdf. Acesso em: 17 out. 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
