A Quantitative Look Upon The Choice Of The Post-Graduation Students In Rural Extension On The Choice By Students Graduate Programme In Rural Extension: A Quantitative Exame
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130812681Keywords:
Social Research, Courses of Agricultural Sciences, Professional ChoiceAbstract
The paper analyzes the profile of students postgraduate and determinants of choice for courses in social research that relate to rural areas. The target group refers to the students of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil. Using a quantitative approach, the research made possible the analysis of different categories that allowed conclusions about those choices. The overall results allow you to check the profile of students by level of postgraduate and determinants of choices from different elements and variables. In general, most students come from rural sciences courses, has no religion and have income over five salaries. Other results point to the prevalence of the public school education of students in primary and high record of rural labor in the family. Among the indicated results, it is concluded that for graduates in rural sciences, vocation seems to represent the major reason for vocational choice.
Downloads
References
BARBETTA, P.Estatística aplicada às ciências sociais. Florianópolis: Ed. UFSC, 2012.
BRUNI, A. SPSS aplicado à pesquisa acadêmica. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
CHIZZOTTI, A. Pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais. São Paulo: Cortez, 1995.
______. A pesquisa qualitativa em ciências humanas e sociais: evolução e desafios. Revista Portuguesa
de Educação, v. 16, n. 2. Portugal:Universidade do Minho, 2003.
DESLANDES, S. Concepções em pesquisa social: articulações com o campo da avaliação em serviços de saúde. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 1997.
FIGUEIREDO FILHO; SILVA JUNIOR. Desvendando os mistérios do coeficiente de correlação de pearson (r). Revista Política Hoje, vol. 18, n. 1, 2009.
FREITAS, C. et al. Material de referência para o curso 1 de estatística. INPE. São José dos Campos, 2003.
FREITAS, H.; MOSCAROLA, J. Da observação à decisão: métodos de pesquisa e de análise quantitativa e qualitativa de dados. São Paulo. RAE, v. 1, n. 1, jan-jun/2002.
GIL, A. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
GRAY, D. E. Pesquisa no mundo real. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2012. 488 p.
MARSIGLIA, R. Orientações básicas para a pesquisa. In: MOTA, A. et al. Serviço Social e Saúde: formação e trabalho profissional. São Paulo: OPAS, OMS, Ministério da Saúde, 2007.
MUNDSTOCK, E. et al Introdução à análise estatística utilizando o SPSS 13.0. Cadernos de Matemática e Estatística. UFRGS. Número XX. Porto Alegre - maio de 2006.
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA. Discentes. Santa Maria, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.ppgexr.com.br/discentes.php. Acesso em: 16 out. 2013.
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ESTADO DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Discentes. Porto Alegre, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.ufrgs.br/agronomia/joomla/index.php/ppgagro-o-programa. Acesso em: 16 out. 2013.
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ESTADO DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. O Programa. Porto Alegre, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.ufrgs.br/pgdr/. Acesso em: 16 out. 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
