Microbiological profile of urban mangrove sediments exposed to effluents from the pharmaceutical industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X41089Keywords:
environment, resistance, microorganismsAbstract
Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o impacto da liberação de efluentes da indústria farmacêutica, por um longo período, na microbiota de um mangue em São Luís, MA. Veja pontos equidistantes que foram amostrados aleatoriamente e o pH foi analisado através da solução de KCl. Além disso, o perfil microbiológico dos sedimentos da área foi estudado através do isolamento pela técnica de diluição em série usando Muller Hinton (MH), Bushnell Hass (BH) mais antibiótico, Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SAB) e Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB). Após o isolamento e a contagem de placas, o número maior de colônias no meio MH (30000 UFC / mL), seguido pelo meio BH (3000 UF / mL), meio SAB (2500 UFC / mL) e EMB (400 UFC) / mL ) O pH dos seis núcleos estava na faixa de pH neutro, variando de 7,10 a 7,40.
Downloads
References
ABDEL EL, HALEEM D. Acinetobacter: environmental and biotechnological applications. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2003;(2):71–74.
ALEF K. Soil respiration. In: ALEF K, NANNIPIERI D. editors. Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, London, 1995. p. 214
BADOLA C, CAMPUS EL, SOTÃO HMP, CAVALCANTE MAQ, LUZ AB. Basidiomycetes de Manguezais da APA de Algodoal-Maiandeua, Pará, Brasil. Ecolab. 2005;(6):141-146.
BANDEIRA AM. O Sambaqui do Bacanga na Ilha de São Luís- Maranhão: inserção a paisagem e levantamento extensivo. Canindé. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia de Xingó. 2006;(8):95-122.
BARBOSA D. CASCABULHO IR. Sistematização e cartografia dos testemunhos pré-históricos dos pescadores, coletores, caçadores: um estudo de caso. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas. 1996;(8): 65-79.
BRITO EMS, et al. Characterization of hydrocarbonoclastic bacterial communities from mangrove sediments in Guanabara Bay, Brazil. Research in Microbiology. 2006;(157):752-762.
CHOFFNES E, et al. Antibiotic resistance: implications for global health and novel intervention strategies: workshop antibiotic resistance. Anais da Conferencier de Washington: National Academy of Science, 2010.
CLARK FE. Agar-plate method for total microbial count. In: C.A. BLANC, D. EVANS, J.L. WHITE, L.E. ENSMINGER, F.E. Clark & R.C. DINAUER, editors. Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. 1965. p. 1460.
CORREIA MD, SOVIERZOSKI HH. Ecossistemas marinhos: recifes, praias e manguezais. 1 e. UFAL. Maceió. Alagoas. 2009.
COSTA CHJ, RAMOS FILHO AJ, SOUSA JSS, CASTRO EJM, PEREIRA CDS, MIRANDA RCM, bioprospecting for microrganismos of biotechnology importance in soils contaminated wth agrochemicals. CIÊNCIA E NATURA, 2018; (40): 1-17.
DIAS LRL, BASTOS DKL, LIMA NS, SILVA MRC, Miranda RCM, Bioprospecção de Microorganismos de Interesse Biotecnológico Isolados em Ecossistema de Manguezal. Revista de Investigação Biomédica. 2017;(9):24-30.
Ferreira N. – 2015 – http://www.netoferreira.com.br/cidade/2015/08/prefeitura-rejeita-problemas-na-instalacao-de-universidade-em-antiga-fabrica-da-merck/. Consulta on line 19.04.2019
GASPAR MD. Análise das datações radiocarbônicas dos sítios de pescadores, coletores e caçadores. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. araense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências da Terra, Belém. 1996;(8):81-91.
HASSAN SS, Ul S, Abdul L. Marine actinobacteria as a drug treasure house. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2017;(87):46-57.
LACERDA LD, et al. Mangrove ecosystems of Latin America and the Caribbean: an ove ecosystems of Latin America and the Caribbean: a summary. Okinawa: Mangrove Ecosystems Technical Reports/ISME. 1993;(2):272.
PEREIRA FILHO O. ALVES JRP. Conhecendo o manguezal. Apostila técnica, Grupo Mundo da Lama, RJ. 4th ed. 2005. p. 10.
POLONI MM. Estudo da produção de substâncias bioativas por fungos endofíticos do mangue. 2014. p. 58.
SARAVANAKUMAR K, KATHIRESAN K, MUBARAKALI D, KAYALVIZHI K, RAJENDRAN N, HEMALATHA S, CHEN J. Soil-microbial communities indexing from mangroves rhizophere and barren sandy habitats. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 2018;(104):56-68
SANGKANU S, RUKACHAISIRIKUL V, SURIYACHADKUN, C, PHONGPAUCHIT S. Evaluation of antibacterial potential of mangrove sediment-derived actinomycetes. Microbial Pathogenesis 2017;(112):303–312.
SER HL, TAN WS, MUTALIB NSA, YIN WF, CHAN, KG, GOH BH, LEE LH. Genome sequence of Streptomyces gilvigriseus MUSC 26 T isolated from mangrove forest. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2018;49(2):207-209.
World Health Organization. Containing antimicrobial resistance. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2005.
Published
Versions
- 2022-06-21 (3)
- 2022-06-21 (2)
- 2020-12-31 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
