Influence of fibrous material on the composting, with the inclusion of different biocatalysts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X72317Keywords:
Organic fertilizer, Biological catalyst, FiberAbstract
The manuscript demonstrate which percentage indexes of fibrous and organic material are necessary in composting windrows, the replacement of the biocatalyst (feces) by organic sludge, with the purpose of forming an alternative quality fertilizer. Individual windrows were designed with different compositions based on 10 calculations of different proportions. The three different materials used in the composting process for each treatment (T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 with animal feces as biocatalyst, and T6, T7, T8, T9 and T10, with sludge as biocatalyst). Each treatment consisted of 1kg of material with the following proportions: T1 - 70% of fibrous material and 30% of organic material; T2 - 50% fibrous material and 50% organic material; T3 - 30% fibrous material and 70% organic material; T4 - 10% fibrous material and 90% organic material; T5 - 0% of fibrous material and 100% of organic material, where the following parameters of the organic fertilizers generated were analyzed: physical - granulometry; density and porosity, chemical – Organic Matter; pH; P; K; Ca; Mg; At; SB; Al; H and CTC. All treatments are within the classification range of soil with weak acidity, since the pH and OM content were between 7.01 and 10.8% respectively. Thus, even with the variation of the organic biocatalysts used, the indices and required levels of the physicochemical parameters analyzed, of all treatments, regardless of the fiber content, were above the references expressed in the literature, demonstrating a high quality in the fertilizers produced.
Downloads
References
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DAS EMPRESAS DE LIMPEZA PÚBLICA E RESÍDUOS ESPECIAIS – ABRELPE. Panorama dos resíduos sólidos no Brasil - 2015. Disponível em: http://www.abrelpe.org.br. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2022.
ANDREOLI, C. V.; PEGORINI, E. S. Gestão de Biossólidos: Situação e Perspectivas. In: I SEMINÁRIO SOBRE GERENCIAMENTO DE BIOSSÓLIDOS DO MERCOSUL, Curitiba, 1998.
BRANCO, S. M.; Murgel, P. H; Cavinatto, V.M. Compostagem: solubilização biológica de rocha fosfática na produção de fertilizante organomineral. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 6, n. 3, p. 115-122, 2001.
COSTA, C. H. J.; RAMOS FILHO, A. J. ; SOUSA, J. S. S. ; CASTRO, E. J. M. ; PEREIRA, C. D. S. ; MIRANDA, RITA DE C. M. de. Bioprospecting for microorganisms of biotechnological importance in soils contaminated with agrochemicals. Ciência e natura, v. 40, p. 02-18, 2018.
CRUSCIOL, C. A. C.; CAMPOS, M. de; MARTELLO, J. M.; ALVES, C. J.; NASCIMENTO, C. A. C.; PEREIRA, J. C. dos R.; CANTARELLA, H. Organomineral fertilizer as source of P and K for sugarcane. Scientific Reports, v. 10, n. 5398, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62315-1.
EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA – EMBRAPA. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos, 2018.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA – IBGE. Panorama, cidades: São Luís – Maranhão. 2017. Disponível em: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ma/sao-luis/panorama. Acesso em: 30 out. 2022.
INÁCIO, C. de T.; MILLER, P. R. M. Compostagem: Ciência e prática para a gestão de resíduos orgânicos. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos, 2009.
LACERDA, K. A. P.; MORAES, J.V. de Q.; SILVA, Y. G.; OLIVEIRA, S. L de. Compostagem: alternativa de aproveitamento dos resíduos sólidos utilizando diferentes modelos de composteiras. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6(6), pp.40753-40763, 2020.
MORAIS, C. A. S.; FIORE, F. A.; ESPOSIO, E. Influência do uso de inóculo aclimatado em processo de compostagem. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, 27, pp.499-510, 2022.
MUSCOLO, A.; PAPALIA, T.; SETTINERI, G.; MALLAMACI, C.; JESKE-KACZANOWSKA, A. Are raw materials or composting conditions and time that most influence the maturity 2 and/or quality of composts? Comparison of obtained composts on soil properties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.204.
PEREIRA, V.R.; FIORE, F.A. Fatores influenciadores da segregação de resíduos orgânicos na fonte geradora para a viabilização de sistemas de compostagem. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, 27, pp.643-652, 2022.
RAIJ, B. V.; ANDRADE, J. C.; CANTARELLA, H.; QUAGGIO, J. A. Análise química para avaliação da fertilidade de solos tropicais. Campinas, Instituto Agronômico, 2001.
RESSETTI, R.R. and CAMPOS, S.X. Aceleração do Processo de Compostagem: Uma revisão. Caderno de Ciências Agrárias, 12, pp.1-12, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35699/2447-6218.2020.20286
RODRIGUES, A. C.; FRANÇA, J. R.; SILVEIRA, R.B. da; SILVA, R. F. da; DA ROS, C. O.; KEMERICH, P. D. C. Compostagem de resíduos orgânicos: eficiência do processo e qualidade do composto. Enciclopédia Biosfera, Centro Científico Conhecer. Goiânia, v.11 n.22; p. 759, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18677/Enciclopedia_Biosfera_2015_116.
SCHOTT FILHO, O.; AGUIAR, A. C. de M.; SILVA, E. C. R. da; PEREIRA, T. C.; FERREIRA, J. A.; BORGES, A. C. Projeto Estiva: uma iniciativa de gestão de resíduos sólidos urbanos em comunidades de baixa renda. Revista ELO – Diálogo em Extensão, Viçosa, v. 06, n. 03, 2017.
SENA, L. M.; de ARRUDA, J. F.; da SILVA COSA, F. R.; de ALMEIDA, F. B. B.; BRIO, P. O. B. de; GONDIM, F. A. Compostagem e vermicompostagem como alternativa para tratamento e de destinação de resíduos orgânicos. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 14(2), p.266-272, 2019.
SILVA, S. H. P. ; GONCALVES, M. M. ; BRAGA, F. H. R. ; LIMA, N. S. ; NUNES NETO, W. R. ; NUNES, M. A. S. ; BASTOS, D. K. L. ; MONTEIRO, A. S. ; SILVA, D. F. ; FIRMO, W. C. A. ; MELO, M. H. F. ; DZIEDZIC, M. ; MIRANDA, R. C. M. ; SILVA, M. R. C. . Environmental Impact of Agrochemical uses on the Islands Agricultural Production Area in Maranhão, Brazil. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: D Agriculture and Veterinary – GJSFR , v. 20, p. 74-85, 2020.
SOUZA, H. D.; OLIVEIRA, E. L.; FACCIOLI-MARTINS, P. Y.; SANTIAGO, L.; PRIMO, A. A.; MELO, M. D.; PEREIRA, G. A. C. Características físicas e microbiológicas de compostagem de resíduos animais. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 71, pp.291-302, 2019.
SOUZA, L. A. de; CARMO, D. de F. do; SILVA, F. C. da; PAIVA, W. de M. L. Análise dos principais parâmetros que influenciam a compostagem de resíduos sólidos urbanos. Revista Brasileira de Meio Ambiente, 8(3), 2020.
TAVARES FILHO, J. Física e conservação do solo e água. Londrina: Eduel, 2016.
TEIXEIRA, P. C.; DONAGEMMA, G. K.; FONTANA, A. Manual de métodos de análise de solo. 3. ed. Brasília: Embrapa Solos, 2017.
WEIL, R. R.; BRADY, N. C. The nature and properties of soils. 15. th. London: Pearson, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.