Áreas de Risco: O Caso da Vila Bilibio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9920Abstract
The present study aims to identify different geomorphologic risksituations and assess the superficial dynamics processes that initiate theseprocesses, in Vila Bilibio, Santa Maria city, Rio Grande do Sul state southernBrazil. Methodologically, a socio-environmental survey of the studied area was carried out, through field interviews, identification, and analyses ofprocesses that cause these risks had been accomplished in two stages, alsoon field. It was verified that the lower baseline more susceptible to flooding/overflow, the second baseline composed by valleys is subject to massgravitational movements and the upper baseline presents lessgeomorphologic risk but one habitation presenting sections and earthworkin embankment with high slope. 27% of the housing present high risk offlooding/overflow and 33% of the housing extreme risk of sliding. It mustbe highlighted that men is the main risk agent in Vila Bilibio, due to theoccupation of adverse areas and for modifying the sides through sectioningand earthworks. However, measures to be taken should be working towardseducation concerning the local environment preservation and rearranginglocal people.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
