Home-made Gauss cannon as a facilitator in teaching magnetism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X86995Keywords:
Electromagnetism, Teaching, Gauss CannonAbstract
Especially regarding public schools, there is a noticeable lack of laboratories or facilities that enable the contextualized teaching of topics in the areas of exact and natural sciences. As a result, there is greater difficulty in students' learning, especially in more abstract content. Since there is already a proven direct relationship between practical and experimental activities and the quality of education. Furthermore, practical activities can provide a rich opportunity to understand more complex problems and enhance various skills such as communication, problem-solving, and socialization. In this context, this work proposes the development of a simple and inexpensive device for conducting physics experiments, especially in the area of magnetism, the Gauss Cannon. This tool allows the visualization of mechanical and magnetic forces.
Downloads
References
ANDERSSON, Å. E.; KARLSSON, C.-J.; LANE, H. The Gaussian cannon. Emergent scientist, v. 1, p. 6–6, 1 jan. 2017.
CURRIE, H. et al. Practical learning through radiation physics problem solving. Radiography, v. 28, n. 4, p. 981–990, 1 nov. 2022.
HALYNA VOITKIV; IGOR LISHINSKY. PRACTICAL WORKS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL PHYSICS COURSE. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, v. 55, n. 6, p. 109–115, 27 fev. 2023.
LUCIANO GONSALVES COSTA; MARCELO ALVES BARROS. O ensino de física no Brasil: Problemas e desafios. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336425046_O_ensino_de_fisica_no_Brasil_Problemas_e_desafios. Acesso em: 16 jan. 2024.
MANUAL DO MUNDO. Como fazer um CANHÃO MAGNÉTICO CASEIRO (CANHÃO DE GAUSS). YouTube, 14 jul. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMErygmHlns&t=275s. Acesso em: 16 jan. 2024.
MARISKA, C.; EGIDIUS DEWA; GODELFRIDUS HADUNG LAMANEPA. TUTORING AND PRACTICAL PHYSICS FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE PANDEMIC ERA. Abdimas Galuh, v. 4, n. 1, p. 286–286, 30 mar. 2022.
PAL, C. et al. DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION SKILLS IN A PHYSICS TEACHING THROUGH PRACTICAL WORK. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, v. 5, n. 06, p. 19–33, 2022.
SHI, X. et al. GAUSS - genesis of asteroids and evolution of the solar system. Experimental Astronomy, v. 54, n. 2-3, p. 713–744, 15 out. 2021.
TAŞAR, Mehmet Fatih (Ed.); HERON, Paula R. L. (Ed.). The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Learning Physics. AIP Publishing LLC, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735425477. ISBN electronic: 978-0-7354-2547-7. ISBN print: 978-0-7354-2544-6.
UENO, S.; TSUKASA SHIGEMITSU. Introduction. CRC Press eBooks, p. 1–20, 6 jun. 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
