Rice Husk Ash Residue Application Potential
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40716Keywords:
Rice husk ash, SiO2, CristobaliteAbstract
The use of agricultural waste has become a necessity due to its high environmental cost. As an example of this, we have rice husk ash (CCA), produced by the indiscriminate burning of rice husk, as well as the need to look for alternatives to reuse the waste sustainably, either by applying it to nanomaterials or by extracting SiO2 present in rice husk ash. This study addresses the use of characterization techniques for rice husk ash residue, showing the quality of SiO2 present in the residue.
Downloads
References
CRACIUM, V., READER, A. H., Vandenhoudt, D. E. W., Best, S. P., Hutton, R. S., Andrei, A. & Boyd, I. W. (1995). Thin Solid Films 255, 290-294.
DELLA VP, KÜHN I, HOTZA D. Caracterização de cinza de casca de arroz para uso como matéria-prima na fabricação de refratários de sílica. Química Nova. 2001;24(6):778-782.
HOFMANN, P. Lecture notes on surface science. 5. ed. Arhus: Springer, 2005, 192 p
HUA M, ZHANG S, PAN B, ZHANG W, LV L, ZHANG Q. Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2012;211-212:317-331.
ISAIA GC, ZERBINO RL, GASTALDINI ALG, SENSALE GR. Viabilidade do emprego de cinza de casca de arroz natural em concreto estrutural (parte II): durabilidade. Ambiente Construído. 2017;17(2):233-252.
JULIANO BO, BECHTEL DB. The rice grain and its gross composition. Rice: chemistry and technology. Minnesota, USA: American Association of Cereal Chemists, 1985.
MOULDER, J. F.; STICKLE, W. F.; SOBOL, P. E.; BOMBEN, K. D. Chastian, J. ed. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Eden Prairie: Perkin-Elmer Corporation. 1992, 275 p.
NAIR DG, JAGADISH KS, FRAAIJ A. Reactive pozzolanas from rice husk ash: an alternative to cement for rural housing. Cementand Concrete Research. 2006;36(6):1062-1071.
SCHULZ PA. Nanomaterials and the interface between nanotechnology and environment. Vigilância Sanitária em Debate. 2013;1(4):53-58.
SOCIEDADE SUL-BRASILEIRA DE ARROZ IRRIGADO – SOSBAI. Reunião Técnica da Cultura do Arroz Irrigado. Arroz irrigado: recomendações técnicas da pesquisa para o Sul do Brasil. Pelotas: SOSBAI, 2016.
XU P, ZENG GM, HUANG DL, FENG CL, HU S, ZHAO MH, LAI C, WEI Z, HUANG C, XIE GX, LIU ZF. Use of iron oxide nanomaterials in wastewater treatment: A review. Science ofthe Total Environment. 2012;424:1-10.
WATTS, J. F.; WOLSTENHOLME, J. An introduction to surface analysis by XPS and AES. John Wiley & Sons, 2003, 207 p.
ZUCCO, L. L. Avaliação do comportamento físico-químico-mecânico de misturas cimento-cinza casca de arroz por meio de corpos-de-prova cilíndricos e placas prensadas[thesis]. Campinas: Faculdade de Engenharia
Agrícola/Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2007. 381 p.
ZUCCO LL, BERALDO AL. Efeito da adição de cinza de casca de arroz em misturas cimento-casca de arroz. Engenharia Agrícola. 2008; 28(2):217-226.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
