Proposalof a nanostructured supercapacitor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35492Keywords:
Nanoparticles, Nanotechnology, SupercapacitorAbstract
By studies in condensed matter physics, as a particle decreases, unicity’s become peculiar, and may even define new properties in their nanostructure, be they electrical, chemical, among others1. Based on the study of the formation of nanoparticles (NP’s) of iron oxides (Fe2O3), which present very interesting electronic properties, such as chemical changes in the atomic structures on external medium interference2. Therefore, (Fe2O3) is promising for nanotechnology that motivates new applications in the engineering, of equal nature are other nanoparticles, being Pd (Pd), Platinum (Pt), Copper (Cu). The latter as excellent conductor of electricity and therefore is very much employed in the manufacture of wires and electrical appliancesin macro scale. Directed by energy storage applications, it is analyzed the possible interactions of metallic nanostructures on the quantity of load carriers, using potential differences on a set of nanostructured plates in parallel3. In this way a supercapacitor can be forged, with an electric field generated between the areas of the plates by a minimum distance and isolated by a high dielectric stiffness4. Suitable for qualitative and quantitative results on device capacitance, loading and unloading time, efficiency in applications with the use of nanostructured thin films.
Downloads
References
BOITA, J.; NICOLAO, L.; ALVES, M. C. M.; MORAIS, J., Controlled growth of metallic copper nanoparticles. New Journal of Chemistry 2017, 41, (23), 14478-14485.
KLEM, M. d. S. Estudo de supercapacitores orgânicos impressos em papel à base de PEDOT:PSS. Universidade Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP", 2017.
MIN, J.; KIERZEK, K.; CHEN, X.; CHU, P. K.; ZHAO, X.; KALENCZUK, R. J.; TANG, T.; MIJOWSKA, E., Facile synthesis of porous iron oxide/graphene hybrid nanocomposites and potential application in electrochemical energy storage. New Journal of Chemistry 2017, 41, (22), 13553-13559.
ZARBIN, A. J. G., Química de (nano)materiais. Química Nova 2007, 30, (6), 1469 - 1479.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
