Environmental inspection based nr-12: development of tools and application in industrial area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613088881Keywords:
Assembly of Industry, Environmental Conditions, EvaluationAbstract
Knowledge of elements that involve the work environment are identified as one of the preventive ways to eliminate risks of environmental problems and exposure to agents unnecessarily to employees of the industrial environment. Given this situation, many practices to support the management of occupational health and safety are developed and verified by scientific means. The present work is the development of a checklist for assessment of compliance of the industrial environment as the elements recommended by the regulatory norm of number 12 of the Ministry of Labour and Employment. The work was developed through research in the literature and the measurement model developed in a company providing services in the industrial area of the town of Mossoró, RN, especially for the Oil and Gas industry The results attest to the good practical employment of the suggested methodology and the possibility of better monitoring practices necessary legal compliance and the adoption of environmental control mechanisms efficientlyDownloads
References
AGUIAR, L. A. Metodologias de Análise de Riscos - APP & Hazop. Rio de Janeiro: 2011. Disponível em: http://professor.ucg.br/SiteDocente/admin/arquivosUpload/13179/material/APP_e_HAZOP.pdf. Acesso em: 6 jul. 2012.
ALENCAR, L. Metodologias de análise de riscos: APP e HAZOP. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ, 2009, 30f. Disponível em http://www.saneamento.poli.ufrj.br. Acesso em 21/06/2012.
ALMEIDA, W. F. De. Trabalho Agrícola e sua Relação com Saúde/Doença. Rio de Janeiro, 1995.
AMORIM, E. L. C. de. Ferramentas de Análise de Risco. Apostila do curso de Engenharia Ambiental da Universidade Federal de Alagoas, CTEC, Alagoas: 2010. Disponível em: http://pt.scribd.com/doc/71505557/Apostila-de-ferramentas-de-analise-de-risco. Acesso em: 8 jul. 2012.
AYRES, D. de O.; CORRÊA, J. A. P. Manual de Prevenção de Acidentes do Trabalho. São Paulo, Editora ATLAS, 2001.
BOSSI et al. Como montar um QDC. Eletrodicas, Montes Claros. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.eletrodicas.com.br/index.php?pg=7&id_busca=9. Acesso em: 18 abril 2013.
CAMACHO, E. N. Uma Proposta de Metodologia para Análise Quantitativa de Riscos Ambientais. (2004). Tese -Programa de Pós-graduação de Engenharia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2004.
LIMPETROL Serviços e Pinturas. Galeria de imagens. Hotfrog, São Paulo. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.hotfrog.com.br/Empresas/Limpetrol-Servi%C3%A7os-e-Pinturas. Acesso em: 18 abril 2013.
MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE DO BRASIL. Doenças relacionadas ao trabalho: manual de procedimentos para serviços de saúde. Ministério da Saúde do Brasil, Representação no Brasil da OPS/OMS. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2001.
MINISTÉRIO DO TRABALHO E EMPREGO. NR-12: Segurança no trabalho em máquinas e equipamentos. 2010. 75p.
MINISTÉRIO DO TRABALHO E EMPREGO. Portaria nº 3.214, de 08 de junho de 1978. NR-6: Equipamento de proteção individual, Brasília, DF, 2012.
MINISTÉRIO DO TRABALHO E EMPREGO. Portaria nº 3.214, de 08 de junho de 1978. NR-31: Segurança e saúde no trabalho na agricultura, pecuária silvicultura, exploração florestal e aqüicultura, Brasília, DF, 2012.
SALIBA, T. M. Curso Básico de Segurança e Higiene Ocupacional. 4. ed. São Paulo: LTR, 2011.
SEGURANÇA E SAÚDE NO TRABALHO. A “cor” como factor de saúde e segurança no trabalho. 2012. Disponível em: http://sst-ugt.blogspot.com.br/2012/02/cor-como-factor-de-saude-e-seguranca-no.html. Acesso em : 18 abril 2013.
SESI-SEBRAE. Dicas de Prevenção de Acidentes e Doenças no Trabalho. SESI –SEBRAE, Saúde e Segurança no Trabalho : Micro e Pequenas Empresas / Luiz Augusto Damasceno Brasil (org.). - Brasília: SESI-DN, 2005.
SINALIZAÇÃO fácil. Placa cuidado risco de choque elétrico manuseio apenas por pessoas autorizadas. São Paulo. 2013. Disponível em: http://sinalizacaofacil.com.br/lojavirtual/productimage.php?product_id=540. Acesso em: 18 abril 2013.
SOUZA, C. A. V. de; FREITAS, C. M. Acidentes de trabalho em refinaria de Petróleo. Revista de Saúde Pública, 2002; 36(5):576-83.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
