Reflexão ambiental do município de Parobé sob a visão de moradores e de alunos da E. E. de Ensino Médio Engenheiro Parobé
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084961Keywords:
Environmental education, Students, Ecological conscience, ResidentsAbstract
With the grand population growth of the latest decades, it also appeared the growth of theenvironmental impacts caused by this demand. The environmental Science has the role ofdeveloping an ecological conscience in the individuals, through the environmental sensibilityrelated to specific knowledge. The issues related to the environment are farther on than creatingrules and laws to reduce these impacts, all of us should feel an integral part as agents of theprocesses that aim at the sustainable development. The present work deals with how the researchwas developed with the students of the Engenheiro Parobé High School and residents of theborough of Parobé. The aim was to check what the residents see about the possible solutions toreduce some environmental problems diagnosed, and to broaden the comprehension of thestudents about environmental aspects of the borough. It was established that for the residentsand for the students the best way to reduce the environmental impacts is the ecological awareness of everybody, because we will just get significant results when we may intervene in theway of thinking, acting and perceiving the world through the Environmental education.
Downloads
References
BÖER, N. Educação Ambiental em Escolas de 1º grau.Santa Maria: UFSM, 1993.
BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental (SEF), Ministério da Educação (MEC). Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: ciências. Brasília. MEC/SEF, 1998.
______. Ministério da Educação (MEC), Secretaria da Educação Média e Tecnológica (Semtec). Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais para o Ensino Médio. Brasília. MEC/Semtec, 1999.
DEMO, P. Avaliação Qualitativa: Polêmicas do nosso tempo. 5.ed. Campinas, SP: Autores associados, 1995.
DIAS, G. F. Educação Ambiental: princípios e práticas. 9.ed. São Paulo: Gaia, 2004.
______. Pedagogia da indignação – cartas pedagógicas e outros escritos. São Paulo: UNESP, 134 p., 2000.
IBGE. Geografia do Brasil: Grande Região Sul. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro. 1986. v.4.
______. In: CENSO populacional 2010. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/ presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=1766. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2011.
JACOBI, P. R. Educação Ambiental: o desafio da construção de um pensamento crítico, complexo e reflexivo. Educação e Pesquisa. São Paulo, v.31, n. 2, p. 233-250, maio/ago. 2005.
MOSMANN, L. Parobé, uma história a ser contada. Parobé. 1999.
MOURA, I. C. C. Qual Educação Ambiental? Elementos para um debate sobre educação ambiental e extensão rural. Agroecologia e desenvolvimento rural sustentável. v. 2. n. 2. p. 43-51, abr./jun. 2001.
PIMENTA, S. G.; ANASTASIOU, L. das G. C. Docência no ensino superior. São Paulo: Cortez, 2002.
PROTEGER- Programa Técnico para Gerenciamento da Região Metropolitana de Porto Alegre. Cobertura vegetal do município de Parobé- RS. V.6., Porto Alegre: CPRM/METROPLAN, 1994.
RAMBO, B.& Pe. S.J. A fisionomia do Rio Grande do Sul. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: Selback, 1956.
REIGOTA, M. Meio Ambiente e Representação Social. São Paulo: Cortez, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
