Percepção ambiental de alunos do ensino fundamental no município de Nova Palma, RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083953Keywords:
Environmental Education, Elementary Education, EnvironmentAbstract
The study of environmental perception becomes important to be able to understand the interrelationships between humans and the environment that surrounds it. The aim of this study is to evaluate the environmental perception of Candida Zasso elementary school students in Palma Nova - RS. For the analysis, was used a questionnaire comprising 13 questions about environment and education, with 12 multiple choice questions and one discursive. Through the results, it was found that overall the series evaluated showed good sense in most environmental issues, with small differences in perception between the series. Students understand the need to preserve the environment, but require more efficient means to make them understand the importance of changing habits and attitudes for a better quality of life.Thus, the results of this study demonstrate the importance to work with environmental education from the school, starting with the most basic concepts of preservation, so that young people understand the importance of small actions on environmental preservation.Downloads
References
BARCELOS, V. Educação Ambiental: sobre princípios, metodologias e atitudes. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2009. 119 p.
BRANDÃO, C. R. O que é educação. 39.ed. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2001.
BRASIL. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Lei 9.795, de 27 de abril de 1999, Dispõe sobre a educação ambiental, institui a Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, 28 abr. 1999. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=321. Acesso em: 27 mai. 2010.
COSTA, A. C.; ARAUJO, A. Percepção ambiental dos alunos de uma escola da rede pública municipal da cidade de Raposa – MA. 2009. Disponível em: http://recantodasletras.uol.com.br/trabalhosacademicos/1759863. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2010.
DIAS, G.F. Educação ambiental: princípios e práticas. 8.ed. São Paulo: Gaia, 2003. FAGGIONATO, Sandra. 2005. Disponível em: http://educar.sc.usp.br. Acesso em: 10 mai. 2010.
FERRARI, R. et al. Conflitos no uso e cobertura da terra no município de Nova Palma, RS. Ciência e Natura, UFSM, 30 (2): p.127- 139, 2008.
GONÇALVES, A. A.; LIMA, M.E. O.; MARQUES, M.R. A percepção e educação ambiental com alunos do ensino fundamental. 2009. Disponível em: legal2009.easyplanners.info/.../3436_Goncalves_Alexandra_Andrade_Goncalves.doc:. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2010.
GONÇALVES, W. Florestas Urbanas. Ação ambiental. Porto Alegre: Ed. Cinco Continentes, 1999.
GUIMARÃES, M. A dimensão ambiental na educação. Campinas: Papirus, 1995.
IBGE. 2009. Nova Palma. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/topwindow.htm?1. Acesso em: Acesso em: 22 abr. 2010.
JACOBI, C.M.; FLEURY, L.C.; ROCHA, A.C.C.L. Percepção ambiental em unidades de conservação: experiência com diferentes grupos etários no Parque Estadual da Serra do Rola Moça, MG. In: 7º ENCONTRO DE EXTENSÃO DA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS, 2004, Belo Horizonte. Anais... Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2004.
LEFF, E. Saber ambiental: Sustentabilidade,Racionalidade, Complexidade, Poder. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2005.
MARCZWSKI, M. Avaliação da percepção ambiental em uma população de estudantes do ensino fundamental de uma escola municipal rural: Um estudo de caso. 2006. 188 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2006.
MELAZO, G. C. Percepção ambiental e educação ambiental: Uma reflexão sobre as relações interpessoais e ambientais no espaço urbano. Olhares & Trilhas. Uberlândia, n. 6, p. 45-51, 2005.
MIRANDA, A.M. 2008. In: Percepção ambiental: O despertar para o conhecimento científico através de uma horta educativa. 1º Encontro de Educação do Colégio Gonçalves Dias. Disponível em: www.gd.g12.br/eegd. Acesso em: 24 mai. 2010.
OLIVEIRA, N. A. S. A percepção dos resíduos sólidos (lixo) de origem domiciliar, no bairro Cajuru - Curitiba-PR: um olhar reflexivo a partir da educação ambiental. 2006. 174 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia). Curso de Pós-Graduação em Geografia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 2006.
PEREIRA, E. M.; FARRAPEIRA, C. M. R.; PINTO, S. L. Percepção e educação ambiental sobre manguezais em escolas públicas da Região Metropolitana do Recife. Rev. eletrônica Mestr. Educ. Ambient., v.17, 2006.
SEGURA, D. S. B. Educação ambiental na escola pública: da curiosidade ingênua à consciência crítica. São Paulo: Annablume/FAPESP, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
