National school feeding programme: an institucional purchasing approach at the quarta colonia and vale do jaguari microregions in the rio grande do sul state
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130812653Keywords:
Políticas públicas, Agricultura familiar, Alimentação escolarAbstract
This paper aims to analyze institutional purchases of products from family farming at the Quarta Colônia and Vale do Jaguari microregions. In this regards, 16 nutritionists who are technicians responsible for the National School Feeding Programme (PNAE) in the municipalities that take part in those microregions were interviewed between September and November, 2013. Results show that both microregions purchases over the 30% prescribed by law, which highlights advances in institutional purchases from family farming for school feeding. Besides, the programme also contributes to the development of the socio-economics of rural communities and foster networking of food production and consumption expanding local and regional markets contributing to improve feeding quality. Thus, it is concluded that PNAE is an important key to promote food security and to add value to products from family farming.
Downloads
References
AYRES, M. at.al.; BioEstat: aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biológicas e médicas. Belém; Sociedade Civil Mamirauá: MCT-CNPq, 2007.
BARBETTA, P. Estatística aplicada às ciências sociais. 7ed. Florianópolis: Ed. UFSC, 2008.
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura e do Abastecimento. Decreto no 6.323, de 27 de dezembro de 2007. Regulamenta a Lei nº10.831, de 23 de dezembro de 2003, que dispõe sobre a agricultura orgânica, e dá outras providências. Brasília; 2007. Disponível em: http://agricultura.gov.br/. Acesso em: Dezembro de 2013.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Fundo Nacional de desenvolvimento da educação. Resolução/CD/FNDE Nº38, de 16 de julho de 2009, 2009.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
GRISA, C et.al. O Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos (PAA) em perspectiva: apontamentos e questões para o debate. Retratos de assentamentos, n.13, p.137-170, 2010.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Cidades. Brasília, 2013. Disponível em: http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/home.php. Acesso em: Dezembro de 2013.
LEONARDI, A. et.al. Redes de cooperação em agroindústrias familiares: a casa da Quarta Colônia. 4º Encontro da Rede de Estudos Rurais; Curitiba 2010.
MALUF, R. S. J. Segurança alimentar e nutricional. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2007.
MARCONI, M.A., LAKATOS, E.M.; Fundamentos da Metodologia Científica. São Paulo: Atlas, 2003.
PERES, F.; MOREIRA, J.C. Saúde e ambiente em sua relação com o consumo de agrotóxicos em um pólo agrícola do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 23 Sup 4:S612-S621, 2007.
PIGNATTI ,W. A.; MACHADO, J. M. H.; CABRAL, J. F. Acidente rural ampliado: o caso das
“chuvas” de agrotóxicos sobre a cidade de Lucas do Rio Verde MT. Rev C S Col, v. 12, n. 1, p. 105–114, 2007.
RICHARDSON, R. J. Pesquisa Social: métodos e técnicas. 3 ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Governo do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Mapa de investimentos região funcional 8 – 2012-2015. Porto Alegre, 2012.
SCHMITT, C.; GRISA, C. Agroecologia, mercados e políticas públicas: uma análise a partir dos instrumentos de ação governamental. In: NIEDERLE, P.; ALMEIDA, L.; VEZZANI, F.M. (Org.). Agroecologia: práticas, mercados e políticas para uma nova agricultura. Curitiba: Kairós, 2013.
TRICHES, R.; SCHNEIDER, S. Reconstruindo o “elo perdido”: a reconexão da produção e do consumo de alimentos através do programa de alimentação escolar no município de Dois Irmãos (RS). In: Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional, n°17, Campinas, 2010
VASCONCELOS, F.A. G.; et. al. O papel do nutricionista no Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar. 2d. Santa Catarina, 2012.
VILLA REAL, L. C.; SCHNEIDER, S. O uso de programas públicos de alimentação na reaproximação do pequeno produtor com o consumidor: o caso do programa de alimentação escolar. Estudo & Debate, Lajeado. V.18, n.2, p.57-79, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
