The importance of school garden planning in child education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40655Keywords:
Extension, School gardens, LearningAbstract
Creating spaces to work on themes such as environment, sustainability and healthy eating is a practice adopted in early kindergarten schools. In this sense, the garden is a tool for working on various themes and developing students' commitment to the environment and to food production using sustainable techniques. Thus, this work aimed to plan and implement a vegetable garden at Escola Municipal de Educação Infantil Sol Criança (Santiago, Rio Grande do Sul) e no Colégio Totem (Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul). The planning of the garden was carried out with the help of teachers and pedagogical coordination of the schools involved, in order to provide greater interaction of students with the garden. For this, the beds were prepared with used tires, so that all the space was accessible to students. Members of the Horta Viva at School Extension Project prepare the flowerbeds and on the day of the vegetable planting the students and teachers of the schools participated in the activity. Activities were also planned to be developed with students during the school year. The garden has allowed for greater integration between students, and the space will serve for various teaching-learning activities in schools.
Downloads
References
ANSCHAU, J. R. et al. Projeto Horta Viva na Escola, Ciência e Natura. 2018, 40: 148-155.
ARRUDA, R. F.; MARQUES, M. R.; REIS, J. T. Implantação de horta escolar utilizando materiais recicláveis como alternativa de ensino de educação ambiental. Interdisciplinary Scientific Journal, v. 4, n. 3, p. 158-176, 2017.
DOLIANITIS, B. M. et al. O papel da horta nas escolas de Educação Infantil. 2018, 40: 63-68.
LEAL, M. M. et al. A horta como laboratório vivo para trabalhar a interdisciplinaridade no ensino médio. 2018, 40: 243-248.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
