The garden is used as a life laboratory to perform interdisciplinary studies in high school
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35527Keywords:
School garden, Interdisciplinary activities, InterdisciplinaryAbstract
Nowadays, education undergoes a process of restructuring and interdisciplinarity is fundamental to minimize the existing limits between the disciplines of High School. The origin of interdisciplinarity lies in the transformations of the ways of producing science and of perceiving reality. In this sense, the school garden can be a way to relate the knowledge of the various disciplines. With this extension work, the objective was to implement a vegetable garden at the Ruy Barbosa State High School, in the municipality of Novo Cabrais - RS, in order to promote interdisciplinary actions. Before the implementation of the garden, a lecture was given to students and teachers. It was chosen an idle place with potential for the cultivation of vegetables, where the vegetable garden was implanted. Lettuce, arugula, tomato, cassava, beet, sweet potato, popcorn, beans, Japanese moranga, fennel, pumpkin, radish and almeirão, among others crops. Among the interdisciplinary activities to be worked in High School are the calculation of the total production of each species cultivated in the garden, study of the centers of origin of each species, scientific names of the cultivated species, use of natural insecticides and organic fertilizer, regions that use the species grown in food and / or as medicinal plants.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Média e Tecnológica. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais. Ensino Médio. Brasília: Ministério da Educação, 2002.
CAMPIOTO, G.M.C. Horta didática: uma abordagem interdisciplinar. [monography]. Viçosa: Departamento de Química/UFV; 2015.
COGO, G. P.; DOLIANITIS, B. M.; ANSCHAU, J. R.; MORAES, R. S.; ZAPPE, J. A.; FRESCURA, K. D.; FRESCURA, V. D. Horta Viva na Escola. In: Trabalhos [recurso eletrônico] da Mostra de Projetos da UFSM-CS [internet]; 2017; Cachoeira do Sul, Brasil. 2017. Disponível em http://w3.ufsm.br/cachoeira/images/2017/2017.2/E-Book_Trabalhos_da_Mostra_de_Projetos_da_UFSM-CS.pdf.
FAZENDA, I. C. A . O que é interdisciplinaridade? São Paulo: Cortez, 2008.
MORIN, E. Os saberes necessários à Educação do futuro. 2nd ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2000.
PAVIANI, J. Interdisciplinaridade: conceitos e distinções. 2nd ed. Caxias do Sul. RS: Educs, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
