Modelado de Relevo na Microbacia do Arroio Cadena - Santa Maria/RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9662Abstract
The present work had as objective to analyze the different onesmodeled of the relief in Arroio Cadena's microbasim, highlighting the areas ofdrainage heads as feeding source for the processes erosive. Made himselfinitially the use of the methodology proposed by the Projeto RADAMBRASIL(1986), and later on adapted by Ross (1992 and 1996), which bases on thedimension interfluvial and the degree of to carve of the channels.The area instudy comes on three compartments geomorphological the Edge of the BrazilianSouthern Plateau, the Central Depression and the Alluvial Plain.The Edge of the Plateau presents steep backs, prevailing modeled ofstrong and very strong dissection, the section of the Central Depressionpresents modeled predominantly medium. Associated the that modeled, hestands out to strong influence of the conditions litológicas and the nichospresence of nascent, in what he refers to the evolution in the relief ways. Thecorresponding section the Alluvial Plain presents modeled predominant ofaccumulation formed by recent deposits, that they favor the occupation mostof the time in a disordered way, contributing to the processes ofdesbarrancamento of the margins.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
