An application of Educational Robotics in the study of irrational number π
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X43158Keywords:
Educational robotics, Mathematics teaching, Number π, LEGO MethodologyAbstract
This work presents a proposal for using Educational Robotics as a teaching tool for the study of the irrational number pi using the LEGO MINDSTORM EV3 robotics kit. The theme of the work was chosen based on the need to transform the learning environment into an attractive place for the student, inserting technology as the main teaching object and allowing the development of logical reasoning and teamwork. Based on what describes the BNCC, according to the LEGO® methodology, four sequential lesson plans were developed, applied to a class of 7th of Elementary School and presented the results. The lesson plans sought the protagonism of the student, leading him to assume the role of investigator of mathematical concepts and skills essential for him to have the mathematical literacy necessary and required by the new basic guidelines of education.
Downloads
References
BRASIL (2018). A Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Sítio Ministério da Educação, URL http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/abase/.
Cysneiros, P. G. (1999). Resenha crítica - a máquina das crianças: Repensando a escola na era da informática. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, 3(5), 139–144.
Silva, A. F. d. (2009). RoboEduc: Uma metodologia de aprendizado com Robótica Educacional. URL http://repositorio.ufrn.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/15128.
Tajra, S. F. (2011). Informática na Educação: novas ferramentas pedagógicas para o professor na atualidade. Érica.
ZOOM, E. E. (2013). Manual Didático Pedagógico. ZOOM Editora Educacional, Curitiba.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
