Educational strategy to favor attitudes towards statistics in engineering students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X42103Keywords:
Attitudes, Statistics, Educational strategyAbstract
The increase in the need of teaching and learning of statistics leads to new research in this area. An exploratory study is presented, during the 2018-2019 school year, to analyze the attitudes towards the statistics, that students of the civil engineering career have at the University of Camagüey, Cuba. Based on experiences validated by the experts Estrada (2002, 2007) and Auzmendi (1992), the application of an educational strategy with three stages is proposed. It is based, applied and evaluated in the characterization of the second-year students of Civil Engineering and the diagnosis of their attitudes towards Statistics. The results show, that the implementation of this methodology, allowed to increase the positive attitude towards statistics and encourage better learning of the teaching process.
Downloads
References
AUZMENDI E. Las actitudes hacia la matemática estadística en las enseñanzas medias y universitarias. Bilbao: Mensajero, 1992.
BLANCO A. Una revisión crítica de la investigación sobre las actitudes de los estudiantes universitarios hacia la Estadística. Revista Complutense de Educación, 19(2), 311-330, 2008.
CASTILLO RDMA, PALACIOS RA. La estrategia como resultado científico de la investigación educativa. Universidad pedagógica F. Varela. Centro de Ciencias e Investigaciones pedagógicas. Pág.19), 2005.
CARMONA J. Una revisión de las evidencias de fiabilidad y validez de los cuestionarios de actitudes y ansiedad hacia la estadística. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3 (1), 5-28, 2004, http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz
ESTRADA A. Actitudes hacia la Estadística e instrumentos de evaluación. En: Actas de las Jornades Europees d’Estadística (pp. 369-384). Instituto Balear de Estadística. Palma de Mallorca, 2002, http://www.caib.es.
ESTRADA A. Actitudes hacia la estadística: Un estudio con profesores de educación primaria en formación y en ejercicio. En M. Camacho, P. Flores y M. P. Bolea (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XI (p. 121-140). La Laguna: SEIEM, 2007.
GAL I, GINSBURG L. The role of beliefs and attitudes in learning statistics: towards an assesment framework. Journal of Statistics Education, 2, 1994, http://www. amstat.org/publications/jse/v2n2/gal.html.
GIL FJ. Actitudes hacia la estadística. Incidencia de las variables sexo y formación previa. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 214, 567-590, 1999.
PADUA J, AHMAN I. Escalas para la medición de actitudes. En J. Padua (Ed.), Técnicas de investigación aplicadas a las ciencias sociales (pp. 154-230). México DF: FCE, 1979.
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-19 (2)
- 2020-02-17 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
