Climatological analysis of persistent, extreme and broad rainfall cases between 1986-2016 in Santa Catarina, Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X42189Keywords:
Applied statistics, Extreme rainfall climatology, Sustainable developmentAbstract
In a better qualified society, in search of sustainable cities, it is important to study and know the extreme and recurrent natural phenomena. Extreme rain, as an example of atmospheric phenomena, causes several and negative impacts on Society, leaving clear signs of the areas most susceptible to disasters. Considering researchs of climatology in Santa Catarina State (SC), as well as the use of applied statistics, the main objective in this research is to study the extreme events of persistent and broad rainfall in the cities of SC between 1986-2016. The results show that the regions that most suffer with high frequency and intensity of this type of phenomenon are more on the coast like Florianópolis and Itajaí. In the other hand, in the last 30 years, the west cities of SC present a decrease in the trend, in the quantity of events and of your total accumulated.
Downloads
References
CARDOSO CS. Abrangência e Persistência de Eventos Extremos de Precipitação no Sul do Brasil: El Niño. Oscilação Sul e Padrões Atmosféricos. 2017. 204f. Tese (Doutorado em Geografia) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina- UFSC. Florianópolis.
CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE ESTUDOS E PESQUISAS SOBRE DESASTRES (Florianópolis). Atlas Brasileiro de Desastres Naturais de 1991 a 2012. Volume Santa Catarina. Florianópolis. CEPED- UFSC, 2013. Atlas.
DEFESA CIVIL DE SC. Disponível em: (www.defesacivil.sc.gov.br). Acesso em: 25/10/2014.
GRIMM AM. Clima da Região Sul do Brasil. In: CAVALCANTI IFA, FERREIRA NJ, JUSTI DA SILVA MGA, SILVA DMAF. Tempo e clima no Brasil. SP.: Ed. Oficina de Textos, 2009. p. 259-274.
HERRMANN MLP. Levantamento dos Desastres Naturais causados pelas adversidades Climáticas no Estado de Santa Catarina de 1980 a 2000. In: Imprensa Oficial do Estado de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, p 1- 89,2001.
HERRMANN MLP, MENDONÇA M. Desvios Climáticos e os Desastres Naturais no Estado de Santa Catarina-BR durante o Período 1980 a 2004. In: Revista Intergeo. Iterações no Espaço Geográfico. Ano 5, n. 5, p. 62-85, 2007.
HERRMANN MLP, MENDONÇA M, CAMPOS JN. São José- SC: Avaliação das enchentes e deslizamentos ocorridos em novembro de 1991 e fevereiro de 1994. In : Geosul, Ano 8, n16, p. 46- 78, 1993.
MARENGO JA, ALVES LM, VALVERDE MC, ROCHA RP, LABORBE R. Eventos extremos em cenários regionalizados de clima no Brasil e América do Sul para o século XXI: Projeções de clima futuro usando três modelos regionais. Relatório 5. MMA/SBF/DCBio, Brasília. 2007.
NUNES AB, DA SILVA GC. Climatology of extreme rainfall events in eastern and northern Santa Catarina state: present and future climate. Revista Brasileira de Geofísica (Impresso), v.31, p.1-13, 2013.
PRIETO RB. Estudo de Eventos Extremos de Chuva Persistente sobre Rio Grande do Sul entre 2004-2013. 2016. 76 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Meteorologia). Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPEL.
REBOITA MS, GAN MA, ROCHA RP, AMBRIZZI T. Regimes de Precipitação na América do Sul: Uma Revisão Bibliográfica. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, v.25, n.2, p. 185-204, 2010.
SILVEIRA RB, BITENCOURT VJB, ALVES MPA, FRANKE AE. Distribuição das Chuvas nos Casos de Eventos Extremos no Município de Itapoá/SC. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE REDUÇÃO DE RISCOS DE DESASTRES: “GESTÃO INTEGRADA EM RRD NO BRASIL E O MARCO DE SENDAI”, 1, 2016, Curitiba, Anais... Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil, 2016. P. 10- 21.
TEDESCHI RG, GRIMM AM, CAVALCANTI IFA. Influence of Central and East ENSO on extreme events of precipitation in South America during austral spring and summer. International Journal of Climatology, v.35. p. 2045–2064. 2014.
TEIXEIRA MS, PRIETO RB. Eventos extremos de chuva no estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, entre 2004 e 2013. Parte 1: definição dos eventos e estatísticas. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, 2019. No prelo.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.