Satisfaction of users with food establishments of UFSM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X39238Keywords:
Satisfaction survey, Quality of Services, Restaurants, Bars, Academic CommunityAbstract
This paper aims to evaluate the degree of satisfaction of the academic community of the Universidade Federal de Santa Maria regarding the bars, snack bars and restaurants in the institution. For that, a questionnaire was developed and applied to teachers, administrative technicians in education and students. We used descriptive statistics and exploratory factorial as data analysis were techniques. The results showed that the individuals who use the establishments within the UFSM are satisfied with the service but are unsatisfied with the price and variety of the products offered. They pointed to a lack of supply of healthy food and limited physical space as factors of dissatisfaction. Implementing improvements in bidding contracts is an alternative to increase the satisfaction of users of the institution's bars, snack bars and restaurants.
Downloads
References
ARCHER, E. R. Mito da motivação. In: BERGAMINI, C. W. CODA, R. Psicodinâmica da vida organizacional: motivação e liderança. São Paulo: Atlas, 1997. p. 23-46.
BAKER, J., LEVY, M., GREWAL, D.An experimental approach to making retail store environmental decisions.Journal of Retailing 68 (4), 445–460, 1992.
BARROS, M. D. Modelo para Avaliação da Qualidade de Serviços em Restaurantes. IN: XXXI Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção. Anais, Bento Gonçalves, 2012.
BITNER, M. J. Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing 56, 57–71, 1992.
CRONIN, J. J.; TAYLOR, S. A. Servperf versus Servqual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expctations Measurement of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, v. 58, n. 1, p. 125-131, 1994.
CRONIN, J.; TAYLOR, S. Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, v. 56, n. 3, p. 55-68, 1992.
DUBE, L. et al. Measuring customer satisfaction for strategic management.Cornell Hoteland Restaurant Administration Quarterly, New York: v. 35, n. 1, p.39-48, 1994.
FERRAZ, J. J.; SOUZA, M. J. B.; VERDINELLI, M. A. Percepção da imagem e satisfação em egressos universitários: uma análise correlacional. In: VII Colóquio Internacional sobre Gestão Universitária de América do Sul. Anais. Argentina, 2007.
GONÇALVES, T. J. M. ; BELDERRAIN, M. C. N.; FREITAS, A. L. P.. Quais Itens Incluir em Um Questionário para Avaliar a Qualidade em Serviços? IberoamericanJournalof Industrial Engineering, v. 3, p. 265-285, 2011.
GONÇALVES FILHO, C.; GUERRA, R. S.; MOURA, A. Mensuração de satisfação, qualidade, lealdade, valor e expectativa em instituições de ensino superior: um estudo do modelo ACSI através de equações estruturais. In: encontro nacional dos programas de pósgraduação em administração – ENANPAD, 27. Anais.Atibaia, 2003.
HOM, W. .Applying customer satisfaction theory to community college planning of studentservices.iJournal: Insight in Student Services, v.2, 2002.
JOHNSON, M. D.; ANDERSON, E. W.; FORNELL, C. Rational and adaptive performance expectations na customer satisfaction framework. JournalofConsumerResearch, v. 21, p. 695-707, Mar. 1995.
KOTLER, P. Administração de Marketing: edição do novo milênio. 10 ed. São Paulo: Prentice Hall, 2000.
LUCAS, A. F. The determinants and effects of slot servicescape satisfaction in a Las Vegas hotel casino.UNLVGaming Research & Review Journal 7 (1), 1-17.
MILLIMAN, R. E. Using background music to affect the behavior of supermarket shoppers.Journal of Marketing 46 (2), p. 86-91, 1982.
OLIVER, R. L. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response.Journal of Consumer Research, Chicago: v. 20, p. 418-430, 1993.
OLIVER, Richard L. Satisfaction: a Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. Boston,Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 1997.
PALÁCIO, A. B.; MENESES, G. D.; PEREZ, P. J. P.The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students.Journal of Educational Administration.Armidale, v.40, p.486-505, 2002.
PARASURAMAN, A; ZEITHAML; BERRY; LEONARD, L. Servqual: Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. JournalofRetailing, v. 64, n. 1, 12-39p., 1988.
PEREIRA, B. C. S.; GIL, C. A Satisfação dos Alunos de Escolas de Administração. In: Anais do IX SEMEAD. Seminários em Administração FEA-USP. São Paulo, 2006.
RYU, K.; HAN, H.New or repeat customers: How does physical environment influence their restaurant experience?International Journal of Hospitality Management 30 (2011) 599–611.
RYU, K.; JANG, S.The effect of environmental perceptions on behavioral intentions through emotions: the case of upscale restaurants. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 31 (1), p. 56-72, 2007.
SHAHARUDIN, M. R.; MANSOR, S. W.; ELIAS, S. J. Food Quality Attributes among Malaysia’s Fast Food Customer.International Business and Management. Vol. 2, n. 1, pp.198-208, 2011.
SOUKI, G. Q.; PEREIRA, C. A. Satisfação, motivação e comprometimento de estudantes de administração: um estudo com base nos atributos de uma instituição de ensino superior.In: encontro nacional dos programas de pós-graduação em administração – ENANPAD. Anais.Curitiba, 2004.
WAKEFIELD, K. L; BLODGETT, J. G.The effect of the servicescape on custormers` behavioral intentions in leisure service settings.Journal of Services Marketing 10 (6), p. 45-61, 1996.
WALTER, S. A.; TONTINI, G.; DOMINGUES, M..Identificando Oportunidades de Melhoria em um Curso Superior Através da Análise da Satisfação dos Alunos. In: 29° Encontro Nacional de Programas de Pós-Graduação em Administração. Rio de Janeiro: 2005. Anais... Rio de Janeiro: ENANPAD 2005 (CD ROM).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.