On a model for pollutant dispersion with reflective boundary conditions and data simulation using CALPUFF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X30764Keywords:
Advection-difusion equation, Reflective boundary conditions, CALPUFFAbstract
The present work is an attempt to simulate the pollutants dispersion in the surroundings of the thermoelectric power plant located in Linhares from a new mathematical model based on reflective boundaries in the deterministic advection-diffusion equation. In addition to the advection-diffusion equation with reflective boundaries, it was used data simulated with the CALPUFF model. The exposed model was validated previously with the Hanford and Copenhagen experiments.
Downloads
References
Arya, S. P. (1999). Air pollution meteorology and dispersion. Oxford University Press, New York.
Barratt, R. (2001). Atmospheric dispersion modelling: an introduction to practical applications. Earthscan, London, UK.
Berkowicz, R. R., Olesen, H. R., Torp, U. (1986). The danish gaussian air pollution model (OML): Description, test and sensitivity analysis in view of regulatory applications, vol 10, Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, pp. 453–481.
Caughey, S. J., Palmer, S. G. (1979). Some aspects of turbulence structure through the depth of the convective boundary layer. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 105, 811–827.
Champagne, F. H., Friehe, C. A., LaRue, J. C., Wyngaard, J. C. (1977). Flux measurements, flux estimation techniques, and fine-scale turbulence measurements in the unstable surface layer over land. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 34, 515–530.
Degrazia, G. A. (1998). Modelling dispersion from elevated sources in a planetary boundary layer dominated by moderate convection. Nuovo Cimento, 21C, 345–353.
Degrazia, G. A., Moreira, D. M., Vilhena, M. T. (2001). Derivation of an eddy diffusivity depending on source distance for vertically inhomogeneous turbulence in a convective boundary layer. Journal of Applied Meteorology, pp. 1233–1240.
Doran, J. C., Horst, T. W. (1985). An evaluation of gaussian plume depletion models with dual-tracer field measurements. Atmospheric Environment, 19, 939–951.
Gryning, S. E., Lyck, E. (1984). Atmospheric dispersion from elevated sources in an urban area: Comparison between tracer experiments and model calculations. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 23(4), 651–660.
Højstrup, J. (1982). Velocity spectra in the unstable boundary layer. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 39, 2239–2248.
Loeck, J. F., Bodmann, B. E. J., Vilhena, M. T. B. (2016). Modelo para dispersão de poluentes na atmosfera com reflexão nos contornos estocásticos. Revista Ciência e Natura, 38 Ed. Especial- IX Workshop Brasileiro de Micrometeorologia, 342–346.
Olesen, H. R., Larsen, S. E., Højstrup, J. (1984). Modelling velocity spectra in the lower part of the planetary boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 29, 285–312.
Özisik, M. (1974). Heat Conduction, 2o edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Pasquill, F., Smith, F. B. (1983). Atmospheric Diffusion, 3o edn. Halsted Press, New York.
Paulson, C. A. (1970). The mathematical representation of wind and temperature profiles in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 9, 857–861.
Schramm, J. (2016). Estudo da dispersão de poluentes em uma usina termelétrica localizada em linhares utilizando o modelo calpuff. Dissertação de mestrado, Programa de pós-graduação em Engenharia Mecânica, UFRGS, Porto Alegre.
Stull, R. B. (1988). An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holanda.
Taylor, G. I. (1922). Diffusion by continuous movements. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 20, 196–212.
USEPA (2016). Preferred / recommended models, [Online]. Disponível: www3.epa.gov/scram001/dispersionpref rec.htm.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
