Production of Meal as a Tool for the Valuation of the fish Residues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X28032Keywords:
Environmental contamination, Environmental management, Fish, Solid waste.Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the flour production for the evaluation of fish residues. This study was carried out in two experiments. The first was characterized by the production of flour from the filleting of abrótea fish, while in the second was used the shrimp residue. The treatments in both experiments consisted of two methods of dehydration: oven (T1) and microwave (T2), with four replicates per treatment. The moisture contents, ashes, total nitrogen and crude protein were evaluated. The results showed that flour production is an important tool for the evaluation of fish waste. The flour of Abrótea and shrimp are an important source of protein and minerals that can be used for animal feeding. The microwave method can be used in the preparation of fish and shrimp flours because it does not alter the crude protein content. The microwave is more advantageous than the oven because it speeds up the dehydration process of fish waste. The flour produced is an alternative for artisanal fishermen and can bring income to fishermen, fishers' families and also to poor communities.
Downloads
References
MINISTÉRIO DA PESCA E AQUICULTURA. Disponível em: http://www.mpa.gov.br/. Acessado em: 29 de jul. 2015. Brasil.
CASTRO AA, PAGANI GD. Secagem e composição química da cabeça de camarão (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone) a diferentes temperaturas. Rev. Bras. Produtos Agroindust. 2004; 6(2): 123-129.
COSTA TVDA, MACHADO NDEJB, BRASIL RJM, FRAGATA NP. Caracterização físico-química e rendimento do filé e resíduos de diferentes espécies de jaraqui (Semaprochilodus spp.). Bol. Inst. Pesca. 2014;40(1): 35-47.
EYNG C, NUNES RV, POZZA PC, SILVA WTMDA, NAVARINI FC, HENZ JR. Farinha de resíduos da indústria de filetagem de tilapias em rações para frangos de corte. R. Bras. Zootec. 2010;39(12):2670-2675.
FELTES MMC, CORREIA JFG, BEIRÃO LH, BLOCK JM, NINOW JL, SPILLER VR. Alternativas para a agregação de valor aos resíduos da industrialização de peixe. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Amb. 2010;14( 6): 669-677.
FERNANDES TM, SILVA JADA, SILVA AHADA, CAVALHEIRO JMDAO, CONCEIÇÃO MJDA. Flour production from shrimp by-products and sensory evaluation of flour-based products. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2013;48(8): 962-967.
FURUYA, WM et al. Composição centesimal e perfil de ácidos graxos de camarão d’água doce. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2006;35(4): 1577-1580.
GODOY AC, FRIES E, CORRÊIA AF, MELO IWA, RODRIGUES RB, BOSCOLO WR. Apparent digestibility of fish meat and boné meal in Nile tilapia. Arch. Zootec. 2016;65(252): 341-348.
LACERDA, MJR, FREITAS KR, SILVA JWDA. Determinação da matéria seca de forrageiras pelos métodos de microondas e convencional. Biosci. J. 2009;25(3): 185-190.
LI H, QU Y, YANG Y, CHANG S, XU J. Microwave irradiation – A green and efficient way to preteat biomass. Bioresource Technol. 2016;199: 34-41.
LIMA SBPDE, RABELLO CBV, DUTRA JUNIOR WM, LUDKE MDOCMM, COSTA FGP. Valor nutricional da farinha da cabeça do camarão marinho Litopenaeus vannamei para frangos de corte. Rev. Caatinga. 2007;20(3): 38-41.
LIMA MDE, MUJICA PIC, LIMA AM. Caracterização química e avaliação do rendimento em files de caranha (Piaractus mesopotamicus). Braz. J. Food Technol. 2012; 4: 41-46.
PASTORINI LH, BACARIN MA, ABREU CM. Secagem de material vegetal em forno de microondas para determinação de matéria seca e análises químicas. Ciênc. Agrotec. 2002;26(6): 1252-1258.
PETENUCI ME, STEVANATO FB, MORAIS DRDE, SANTOS LP, SOUZA NEDE, VISENTAINER JV. Composição e estabilidade lipídica da farinha de espinhaço de tilápia. Ciênc.Agrotec. 2010;34(5): 1279-1284.
PIRES DR, MORAIS ACNDE, COSTA JFDA, GÓES, LCDSDEA, OLIVEIRA GMDE. Aproveitamento do resíduo comestível do pescado: aplicação e viabilidade. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável. 2014;9(5): 34-46.
PORTELLA CDEG, SANT’ANA LS, VALENTI WC. Chemical composition and fatty acid contents in farmed freshwater praws. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2013;48(8): 1115-1118.
ROSSATO S, LAZZARI R, LIBERALESSO DE FREITAS I, MASCHIO D, CORREIA V, RADÜNZ NETO J. Diferentes níveis de incorporação de farinha de resíduos de jundiás (Rhamdia quelen) cultivados na dieta. Arq. Bras. Méd. Vet. Zootec. 2014;66(3): 894-902.
SAS Institute. Statistical analysis system. Release 9.1. (Software). Cary, 2003.
SILVA DJ, QUEIROZ ACDE. Análise de Alimentos: Métodos Químicos e Biológicos. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 2004.
SOUZA GB, NOGUEIRA ARA, RASSINI JB. Determinação de matéria seca e umidade em solos e plantas com forno de microondas doméstico. São Carlos: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. 2002.9p. (Circular Técnica 33).
VALENTE BS, XAVIER EG, MORSELLI TGA, LOPES M. Proteína bruta da farinha de minhoca da espécie Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826) submetida a diferentes tratamentos térmicos. Rev. Bras. Higien Sanid Anim. 2015;9(1): 102-107.
VALENTE BS, XAVIER EG, PEREIRA HS, PILOTTO MVT. Compostagem de resíduos da filetagem de pescado marinho e casca de arroz. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim. 2016;17(2): 237-248.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
