Teaching about venomous animals in two public schools in the municipality of Benjamin Constant - AM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25342Keywords:
Zoology, Venomous animals, Elementary SchoolAbstract
Venomous animals are found in a variety of environments, including residential urban areas, which creates a suitable place for reproduction. In this sense, the present work had as objective to understand the approach of the theme of venomous animals in two public schools of the municipality of Benjamin Constant-AM. To that end, students and teachers of basic education working in Primary Education were part of the research, in which structured questionnaires were applied with open and closed questions. In addition, multimedia resources were used for the visual demonstration of concepts, ecological importance, examples, general characteristics and differentiation between venomous and venomous animals. The obtained data were analyzed and tabulated following arithmetic mean between the answers. It was noted that the students involved have a vast knowledge about venomous animals, but that these need to be more worked in a contextualized way facilitating a better understanding of scientific terms, thus improving methods of accident prevention and that these can be multipliers of this knowledgeDownloads
References
ANDRADE, M.A.B.S.; CAMPOS, L.M.L. Análise da aplicação da aprendizagem baseada em problemas no ensino de biologia. Anais... In: ENPEC- Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 5, Bauru. Atas do V ENPEC; 2005.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Manual de diagnóstico e tratamento de acidentes por animais peçonhentos. 2.ed. Brasília: Fundação Nacional de Saúde, 2001.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Portal da saúde. Brasília, Brasil; 2009. Disponível em Acesso em 08 de jun de 2016.
CHAUÍ, M.M. Filosofia. São Paulo: Ática, 2000.
FERREIRA, A.B.H. Aurélio o dicionário da língua portuguesa. Paraná: Positivo. 2008.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da Autonomia: saberes necessários a pratica docente. 33.ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
FUNED - Fundação Ezequiel Dias. Animais peçonhentos. Belo Horizonte. 3.ed. 2009.
INSTITUTO BUTANTAN. Animais Peçonhentos: Serpentes. Série Didática 5. São Paulo, SP s/d. 2016.
LAKATOS, E.M.; MARCONI, M.A. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 6 ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.
LIMA, K.E.C.; VASCONCELOS, S.D. Acidentes com animais peçonhentos: um estudo etnozoológico com agricultores de Tacaratu, sertão de Pernambuco. Sitientibus Série Ciências Biológicas, v.6, n.2, p.138-144, 2006.
PRODANOV, C. C.; FREITAS, E. C. Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. 2.ed. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale, 2013.
RAMOS, E.L.P.; MOURA, R.G.F.; MACEDO, M.M.; SIQUEIRA, L.H.C.; SPOSITO, N.E.C.; KATAGUIRI, V.S. Uma abordagem lúdica dos animais peçonhentos no ensino fundamental. Em extensão, v.11, n.2, p.45-53, 2012.
ROBERTS, B.K.; ARONSOHN, M.G.; MOSES, B.L.; BURK, R.L.; WEEREN, F.R. Bufo marinus intoxication in dogs: 94 cases (1997-1998). Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association, v.216, n.12, p.1941-1944, 2000.
SAKATE, M.; OLIVEIRA, P.C.L. Toad envenoming in dogs: effects and treatment. Journal Venomous Animal sand Toxins, v.1, n.6, p.53-62, 2000.
SAZIMA, I.; HADDAD,C.F.B. Répteis da serra do Japi: notas sobre historia natural. In: História Natural da Serra do Japi: Ecologia e Preservação de uma área florestal no Sudeste do Brasil (L.P.C. Morellata.org.). p.24-49. 1992. Campinas: Editora da Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
TRIVIÑOS, A.N.S. Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. São Paulo: Atlas, 1987.
VASCONCELOS, B.S.S. Percepção de estudantes do ensino médio de Campina Grande sobre os animais peçonhentos. Monografia (Graduação em Ciências Biológicas). 2014. 36p. Campina Grande. Universidade Estadual da Paraíba. 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
