Selective collection: perception and knowledge about the subject - an exploratory research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613088323Keywords:
Environmental Management, Solid Waste, Selective CollectionAbstract
Environmental issues are more and more present in everyday population and in corporate environment. In order to obtain sustainable development, practices aimed to the sustainability are developed every time. One way to achieve this development is the management of solid waste, through the selective collection. The best disposal of solid waste can build a sustainable population in the social and environmental viewpoint, through the reduction of waste generated, reuse and recycling of materials as an alternative income. This work aims to diagnose the perception of a group of students in relation to knowledge of selective collection. By this study it was verified that the interviewees have knowledge about the selective collection, but few of them do it. It was perceived too that there is not a meaningful identification on the part of the interviewees about the solid waste collection in their cities, indicating that this kind of practice needs to be disseminated and implemented on ample scales.Downloads
References
ANDRADE, Rui Otávio; Bernardes de. TACHIZAWA, Takeshy.; CARVALHO, Ana Barreiros de. Gestão Ambiental: Enfoque Estratégico Aplicado ao Desenvolvimento Sustentável. São Paulo: MAKRON books, 2000.
III CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE GESTÃO AMBIENTAL. BELTRAME, Thiago Favarini; LHAMBY, Andressa Rocha; SOARES, Aline; SCHMIDT, Alberto Souza. Diagnósticos dos resíduos e viabilidade de implantação de coleta seletiva em um município do Rio Grande do Sul. Terceiro Congresso Nacional de Gestão Ambiental, Goiás, 2012.
COELHO, M. R. F. Coleta Seletiva. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente. São Paulo, 2001.
DONAIRE, Denis. Gestão ambiental na empresa. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 1999.
FELIX, Rozeli Aparecida Zanon. Coleta seletiva em ambiente escolar. Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental. Vol. 18. 2007.
GOMES, Alessandro. A gestão do sistema ambiental e a NBR ISSO 14001. Revista Científica Eletrônica de Administração. nº 11. Garça 2006.
HAIR, Júnior. Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA - IBGE. Estatísticas de Empreendedorismo. Rio de Janeiro, 2011. Disponível em: http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/monografias/GEBIS%20%20RJ/empreendedorismo_2008.pdf. Acesso em: 10 de outubro de 2012.
MARCONI, Marina Andrade de., LAKATOS, Eva Maria. Fundamentos de metodologia cientifica. 7ª ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
MORAES, F.G. ACAMART: Autogestão e participação na cadeia produtiva. É possível? Revista Geográfica de América Central. Número Especial EGAL, 2011.
MATTAR, Fauze Najib. Pesquisa de marketing. Edição Compacta. 3ª ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2001.
PIVA, Carla; BONONI, Vera Lúcia Ramos; FIGUEIREDO, Regina Sueiro; SOUZA, Celso Correia de. Sistema de Gestão Ambiental implementado aos moldes da ISO 14001:2004 em um frigorífico de abate de aves, no Município de Sidrolândia – Mato Grosso do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional. v. 3, n. 3, p. 20-53, set-dez/2007.
SILVA, Nilza Nunes da. Amostragem probabilística: um curso introdutório. 2. ed. São Paulo: USP, 2004.
TINOCO, João E. Prudêncio; KRAEMER, Maria Elisabeth Pereira. Contabilidade e gestão ambiental. São Paulo: Atlas, 2004.
TRIVINÕS, A.N.S. Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. São Paulo: Atlas,1987.
VALLE, Cyro Eyer. Qualidade ambiental: ISO 14000. 4ª ed. São Paulo: SENAC, 2002.
YIN, Robert K. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos. 2ª ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
