Perspectives for women's empowerment through the reading of children's classics for initial educational series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130843392Keywords:
Education, Empowerment, Teaching, OvercomingAbstract
This article discusses the issue of women's empowerment and aims to reflect on a pedagogical proposal for primary school students in a public school in the municipality of São Gabriel/RS. Students from the fifth year of elementary school. The objective was to report a reflection on the role of women in contemporary society, starting from a rereading of children's classics. It is considered that by discussing new teaching and learning practices related to the role of women in the contemporary world, we can stimulate educators to seek new perspectives for their practices in all areas of knowledge. The result of these practices after analyzing the students' reports was to raise everyone's awareness about the importance of women's struggle and achievements in contemporary society. It was considered that "contemporary princesses" can save themselves and achieve the expected "happy ending" that most fairy tales bring, without, however, counting on a "prince charming". In this context it was realized that women's achievements are part of a modern reality, which must always be related to all teaching practices.
Downloads
References
ANDREWS, Mark; CHAPMAN, Brenda; Animation Studios Pixar. Filme: Valente (2012)
BETTLHEIM, Bruno. Psicanálise dos contos de fadas. São Paulo: Bertrand,13° edição, 2008.
BLOG. A mente é maravilhosa. Disponível em: https://amenteemaravilhosa.com.br/princesa-se-salvou-sozinha/. Acesso em: 28/10/2019
BOTTON, Andressa. Educar para o empoderamento de meninas: apostas na infância para promover a igualdade de gênero. Brasília, DF, v.11 n.2, p.54-66, jan./jun. 2018.
CRUZ, Maria Helena Santana. Empoderamento das mulheres. Inc.Soc., Brasília, DF, v.11 n.2, p.101-114, jan./jun. 2018.
DEMO, Pedro. Educar pela pesquisa. 7. ed. Campinas: Autores Associados, 2011.
DISNEY, Walt. Animation Studios. Filme: Moana (2016)
FORUM. REVISTA DIGITAL. Disponível em: https://revistaforum.com.br/digital/162/empoderamento-infantil-feminismo-e-equidade-para-criancas/. Acesso em: 31/10/2019.
FREIRE, Paulo. A importância do ato de ler. 49 ed. São Paulo, Cortez, 2008.
PERUZZI, Sarah Luchese; FOFONKA, Luciana. A importância da aula prática para a construção significativa do conhecimento. Porto Alegre,2013.
ROCHA, Jefferson Marçal; HAMMES, Lucio Jorge. Gestão e democracia em uma escola Pública. Revista Brasileira de Politicas e Administração da Educação. v. 34,N.2,p. 635 – 652, mai/ago, 2018.
STROMBERG, Robert. Walt Disney Pictures. Filme: Malévola (2014).
THIOLLENT, M. Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.
TODA MATERIA. SITE. Disponível em: https://www.todamateria.com.br/feminismo-no-brasil/. Acesso em: 31/10/2019.
TRIPP, David. Pesquisa-ação: uma introdução metodológica. Educ. Pesqui. [online]. 2005, vol.31, n.3.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
