O papel da história como ferramenta de educação ambiental nas escolas de educação infantil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613082791Keywords:
History, Environment education, Child education, ToolAbstract
This work is the result of research that aims at analyzing matters dealing with EnvironmentEducation, historiographic interpretation and the evolution of these processes. Checking theperception of teachers, workers, directors, active professionals in child education, analyzing whatthey are doing and or cooperating that in fact Environment Education become effective in schools.The role of History as a subject that seeks human and social development, to cooperate with theseprojects and if this cooperation exists.The role of History is seen as a tool for the formation ofcitizenship and to analyze the connection of Environment History with current reality and itstransformation along the years, as well as checking how Environment Education is done at thebase of our society / the children, by the people that handle it – the teachers; to analyze theenvironment perception of children after performing practical environment education activities atEMEI Paraíso da Criança, in the city of Horizontina – RS, with 4 / 5 year old children; motivatingchildren with practical activities. Realized with the completion of that environment education neds to be further elaboborated with the children clearly and objective, tutting theory into practicethrough projects where children are the performers.Downloads
References
BARCELLOS.S.B. Ações em Educação Ambiental e suas relações com a Interdisciplinaridade e cidadania: O caso do Projeto Social “Educação Ambiental na vila Kennedy”,no período de mar./09.2009. 95f.Monografia (Especialização em Educação Ambiental)-Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2009.
KIST.A.F. “A Água numa perspectiva crítica da Educação Ambiental”: uma análise a partir da III Conferência Nacional Infanto-Juvenil pelo Meio Ambiente. no período 2009. 91f. Monografia (Especialização em Educação Ambiental)- Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2009
LOVELOCK, James. Aquecimento Global, a Terra Ardente. REVISTA PLANETA - CONHEÇA O MUNDO DESCUBRA VOCE, São Paulo, ano 33, Ed.414, março 2007.
MINISTERIO DA EDUCAÇÃO E DESPORTO. Referencial Curricular Nacional para a Educação Infantil: conhecimento de Mundo. V.3. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1998.
MONTENEGRO, J. F ; DUARTE, F. C . Ação Coletiva na Sociedade de Risco. In: CONPEDI - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito, 2008, Salvador. Anais do Conpedi - 2008, 2008. Disponível em: http://lattes.cnpq.br/. Acesso em: 23 fev 2010.
NEFUSSI, Nelson; LICCO, Eduardo. Políticas de Saneamento e Meio Ambiente. 2000. Disponível em: http://www2mre.gov.br/cdbrasil/. Acesso em: 26 abr.2009.
______.Enchentes.Disponível em: http://www2.mre.gov.br/cdbrasil/itamaraty/web/port/meioamb/mamburb/enchente/apresent.htm. Acesso em: 26 abr.2009.
PIAGET, J. A psicologia da criança. 17 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2001.
SOARES, H.Pós – Modernidade e Exclusão. A Razão. São Paulo, 02 fev 2002. Disponível em: http://www.angelfire.com/sk/holgonsi/. Acesso em: 5 ago 2009.
________. Pós – Modernidade, política e educação. A razão. Recife, 11 Nov 2005. Disponível em: http://www.angelfire.com/sk/holgonsi/. Acesso em: 5 ago 2009.
_____. Globalização: sobre os “Riscos de grande Consequencia” A Razão. [S.L], 07 dez 2000. Disponível em: http://www.angelfire.com/sk/holgonsi/. Acesso em: 5 ago 2009.
_____. Cidadania como um conceito de Totalidade. A Razão. [S.L] 10 set 1993. Disponível em:
http://www.angelfire.com/sk/holgonsi/. Acesso em: 25 ago 2009.
____. Globalização e Participação Política. A Razão .[S.L] jun 2001. Disponível em: http://www.angelfire.com/sk/holgonsi/. Acesso em: 22 ago 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.