Environment and the thermal expansion of education in the perspective of a group of high school Physics teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820460Keywords:
Teaching physics, Thermal expansion, TeachersAbstract
The theoretical approach of thermodynamics along with its context provides a better understanding of the phenomena of everyday life. Similarly, the connections with the thermodynamic processes environment for students provide a better understanding of the concepts and an interdisciplinary approach. Among the various topics taught in physics in high school, the thermal expansion is a content in which students and teachers with no degree in physics present difficulties. Thus, this work is part of a study on the teaching of thermal expansion, having as main objective to know the perspective of a group of physics teachers on the teaching of Thermal Expansion, enabling the understanding of which concepts related to this topic have more problems in teaching and learning in school. For this purpose, a questionnaire was administered to five teachers of physics, which contributed to meet the perspective of these teachers on the teaching of physics. The education in physics should make students able to understand, participate and intervene in situations that surround them. For this, the teacher should seek to foster students to learning situations where they can make the association between scientific knowledge and knowledge they already possess, being able to differentiate formal from informal knowledge.Downloads
References
ARRUDA, P. H. Z. Aplicações dos fundamentos da Teoria da Aprendizagem Significativa Crítica como instrumentos facilitadores do ensino de termodinâmica em Física Ambiental. Cuiabá, 2009. 100f. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Pós-Graduação em Física Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso.
BEN-DOV, Y. Convite à Física. Traduzido por Maria Luiza X. de A. Borges. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Ed., 1996. Tradução de: Invitation à la physique.
BOGDAN, R. C.; BIKLEN, S. K. Investigação Qualitativa em Educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto – Portugal: Porto Editora, 1994.
BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Média e Tecnológica. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais para o Ensino Médio. Ciências da Natureza, Matemática e suas Tecnologias. Brasília: MEC, 2000.
BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Média e Tecnológica. PCN+ Ensino Médio: Orientações Educacionais Complementares aos Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais. Brasília: MEC, 2002.
CARVALHO JUNIOR, G. D. Aula de Física: do planejamento à avaliação. 1. ed. São Paulo: Editora Livraria da Física, 2011.
FELDMANN, M. G. Formação de professores e cotidiano escolar. In: FELDMANN, Marina Graziela (org.). Formação de professores e escola na contemporaneidade. São Paulo: Editora Senac, 2009.
GASPAR, A. Atividades experimentais no ensino de Física: uma nova visão baseada na teoria de Vigotski. 1. ed. São Paulo: Editora Livraria da Física, 2014.
MELLO, G. J. ; SANTOS, V. M. P. ; PAZ, R. C. R. . Física ambiental e educação do campo: experiência em ensino significativo na Amazônia Legal. Revista Pedagogia em Foco, v. 7, p. 126-144, 2012.
MOREIRA, M. A. Aprendizagem Significativa Crítica. Versão revisada e estendida de conferencia proferida no III Encontro Internacional sobre Aprendizagem Significativa, Lisboa, 2000. Publicada nas Atas desse Encontro, pág. 33-45, com o título original de Aprendizagem significativa subversiva.
MOREIRA, M. A. Teorias da Aprendizagem. São Paulo: EPU, 1999.
MUELLER, E. R.; MELLO, G. J.; OLIVEIRA, V. S. Ensino de ciências e matemática na Amazônia Legal: o processo de definição dos conceitos da abordagem na educação do campo. Universitas Humanas, v. 9, n. 1, p. 31-40, 2012.
PRODAV, C. C.; FREITAS, E. C. Metodologia do Trabalho Científico: Métodos e Técnicas da Pesquisa e do Trabalho Acadêmico. 2ª edição. Novo Hamburgo, RS: FEEVALE, 2013.
VILLATORRE, A. M.; HIGA, I.; TYCHANOWICZ, S. D. Didática e Avaliação em Física. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
