Sustainable development x Economic development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130817768Keywords:
Learning policy, Sustainability, Environmental balanceAbstract
Sustainable development is the rational use of natural resources for the welfare, ensuring the economic growth needed to meet our demands and the needs of future generations. In order to identify the conceptual origins and some practices aimed at sustainability developed the study. Natural resources are becoming increasingly scarce, and that they take into account their possible exhaustion. With this threat, alternatives are sought for the socio-economic development is sustainable. A strong social policy is still the main need for the achievement of sustainable development, especially in emerging countries like Brazil. Environmental issues related to the use of pesticides, excessive deforestation, hand slave and child labor are some of the factors that public policies attempt to inhibit, but continues to act slowly and ineffectively in most states. So there is an emerging change of social paradigms, where it is necessary to realize values that drive our economic development and our relationship with the environment. The use of sustainability becomes the great social challenge of the coming decades.Downloads
References
CANEPA, Carla. Cidades Sustentáveis: o município como lócus da sustentabilidade. São Paulo: Editora RCS, 2007.
CARVALHO, I. A Invenção ecológica. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2001.
CASTRO, Moacyr. A natureza é a alma do negócio. Revista Jurídica Consulex, Brasília, 317 pg 63 a 65, março de 2010.
FERREIRA, Leila da Costa. A questão ambiental: sustentabilidade e políticas públicas no Brasil. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 1998.
GODARD, Olivier. A gestão integrada dos recursos naturais e do meio ambiente: conceitos, instituições e desafios de legitimação- In: Paulo Freire Vieira e Jacques Weber (Org.) tradução: Anne Sophie de Pontbriand Vieira, Christilla de Lassus.- Gestão de recursos naturais renováveis e desenvolvimento: novos desafios para a pesquisa ambiental. São Paulo: Cortez, 1997.
IACOMINNI, Vanessa. Biopirataria de Material Genético Humano uma discussão oportuna. Revista Jurídica Consulex , Brasília: p38, 40, fevereiro, 2011.
MENDES, Marina Ceccato. Desenvolvimento sustentável. Disponível em: http://educar.sc.usp.br/biologia/textos/m_a_txt2.html. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2014.
PRAHALAD, C. K. A Riqueza na base da pirâmide: como erradicar a pobreza com o lucro. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
PÁDUA, S.; TABANEZ, M. (orgs.). Educação ambiental: caminhos trilhados no Brasil. São Paulo: Ipê, 1998.
REIGOTA, M. Desafios à educação ambiental escolar. In: JACOBI, P. et al. (orgs.). Educação, meio ambiente e cidadania: reflexões e experiências. São Paulo: SMA, 1998. p.43-50.
RODRIGUES, Marcelo Abelha. Instituições de direito ambiental. Vol I – Parte Geral, São Paulo: Max Limonad, 2002.
SEBILIA, Andres Salomon Cohen; Lixo: Uma Radiografia de nossa Sociedade. Disponível em: http://www.sesc-se.com.br-educação-Monografia. 2007. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
