Learning experience design: evaluation of the Addie model and contributions for distance education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2318133831922Abstract
Reflecting on the design of learning, leads us to understand how the learner grasps for this learning process to occur effectively. The role of the teacher is important in the whole process, because it will provide the student with a learning experience that is achieved. The purpose of this research is to describe the Addie model - Analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation - and evaluate their contributions to teaching practice, making use of the design of learning experience in distance learning higher education. We conclude that the Addie model is an important tool in pedagogical planning. In which, the teacher needs to complete the steps all steps to then evaluate the student learning.
Key-words: experience design; evaluation; model Addie.
Downloads
References
BERTALANFFY, Karl Ludwig von. Teoria geral dos sistemas. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2008.
BONFIM, David. Pedagogia no treinamento. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark, 1998.
FILATRO, Andrea. Design instrucional na prática. São Paulo: Pearson Education do Brasil, 2008.
GOMES, Alex Sandro; SILVA, Paulo André. Design de experiências de aprendizagem: criatividade e inovação para o planejamento das aulas. Recife: Pipa Comunicação, 2016.
LEBRUN, Marcel. Quality towards an expected harmony: pedagogy and technology speaking together about innovation. AACE Journal, 15(2), 115-130. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 21, 2017. Disponível em https://www.learntechlib.org/p/21024/. Acesso em 10 ago. 2017.
LIBÂNEO, José Carlos. Democratização da escola pública: a pedagogia crítico-social dos conteúdos. São Paulo: Loyola, 1990.
LIMA, Marcos Antonio Martins. Auto-avaliação e desenvolvimento institucional na educação superior: projeto aplicado em cursos de administração. Fortaleza: UFC, 2008.
LUCKESI, Carlos Cipriano. Avaliação da aprendizagem escolar: estudos e proposições. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2005.
KRAEMER, Maria Elisabeth Pereira. A avaliação da aprendizagem como processo construtivo de um novo fazer. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, v. 10, n. 2, 2005, p. 137-147.
RAABE, André Luis Alice; GOMES, Alex Sandro; BITTENCOURT, Ig Ibert; PONTUAL, Taciana. Educação criativa: multiplicando experiências para a aprendizagem. Recife: Pipa Comunicação, 2016.
SIMÃO NETO, Antonio; HESKETH, Camile Gonçalves. Didática e design instrucional. Curitiba: Iesde, 2009.
SOUZA, Andréa Moura da Costa. Avaliação docente em estagio probatório: estudo das ações educacionais do programa CASA/UFC-comunidade de cooperação e aprendizagem significativa. Fortaleza: UFCE, 2016. 173f. Tese (doutorado em Educação). Universidade Federal do Ceará.
STUFFLEBEAM, Daniel. The CIPP model for evaluation: an update, a review of the model’s development, a checklist to guide implementation. Paper read at Oregon Program Evaluators Network Conference, at Portland, Oregon, 2003.
TYLER, Ralph. Princípios básicos do currículo e do ensino. Porto Alegre: Globo, 1974.
VIÉVILLE, Claude; PETER, Yves-Alain. Learning activity modeling and management. International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE’02). IEEE. Auckland, New Zealand, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors keep copyright and concede to the magazine the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, non-commercial license with no derivative work, which allows to share the work with no author recognition and initial publication in this magazine.
Authors has authorization to overtake additional contracts separately, to distribute a non-exclusive version of the work published in this magazine: For example: to publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter of a book, with authorial recognition and initial publication in this magazine.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online. For example: in institutional repositories or in their own personal page – at any point before or during the editorial process, because this can result in productive changes, as well as increase the impact and the mention to the published work.